ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024
Online Adaptive MR-Guided Ultrahypofractionated Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: Clinical Experience and Prospective Evaluation.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04172753 (Feasibility of Imaging and Radiotherapy on a Novel 1.5 T Hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Linear Accelerator System), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility of Imaging and Radiotherapy on a Novel 1.5 T Hybrid Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Linear Accelerator System (MR-Linac)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transition from Oncologist- to Therapist-Led MRI-Guided Ultra-Hypofractionated Adaptive Prostate Radiation Therapy: Evaluation of Early Clinical Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Quantifying setup uncertainty between computed tomography guidance and magnetic resonance guidance in intramuscular metastases radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- MR-Linac-Based SBRT for Prostate Cancer: Dosimetric Benefits for Urethral Sparing Compared to VMAT and Tomotherapy.Cancers · 2026Article
- Evaluating dosimetric outcomes: a comparison of CyberKnife, VMAT FFF, and Helical Tomotherapy Radixact for treating localized prostate cancer.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance-guided adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients: a systematic literature review.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025Review
- Fast machine learning image reconstruction of radially undersampled k-space data for low-latency real-time MRI.PloS one · 2025Article
- Ultra-Hypofractionated Prostate Radiotherapy With Online Adaptive Technique: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Magnetic-Field-Induced Secondary-Electron Effects in MR-Guided Radiotherapy: From Dosimetric Mechanisms to Workflow-Based Clinical Risk Management.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer has been increasingly evaluated, whereas accumulated evidence demonstrates comparable oncologic outcomes and toxicity rates compared to normofractionated radiotherapy. In this prospective study, we evaluate all patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with ultrahypofractionated (UHF) MRI-guided radiotherapy on a 1.5 T MR-Linac within our department and report on workflow and feasibility, as well as physician-recorded and patient-reported longitudinal toxicity. A total of 23 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated on the 1.5 T MR-Linac with a dose of 42.7 Gy in seven fractions (seven MV step-and-shoot IMRT) were evaluated within the MRL-01 study (NCT04172753). The duration of each treatment step, choice of workflow (adapt to shape-ATS or adapt to position-ATP) and technical and/or patient-sided treatment failure were recorded for each fraction and patient. Acute and late toxicity were scored according to RTOG and CTC V4.0, as well as the use of patient-reported questionnaires. The median follow-up was 12.4 months. All patients completed the planned treatment. The mean duration of a treatment session was 38.2 min. In total, 165 radiotherapy fractions were delivered. ATS was performed in 150 fractions, 5 fractions were delivered using ATP, and 10 fractions were delivered using both ATS and ATP workflows. Severe acute bother (G3+) regarding IPS-score was reported in five patients (23%) at the end of radiotherapy. However, this tended to normalize and no G3+ IPS-score was observed later at any point during follow-up. Furthermore, no other severe genitourinary (GU) or gastrointestinal (GI) acute or late toxicity was observed. One-year biochemical-free recurrence survival was 100%. We report the excellent feasibility of UHF MR-guided radiotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients and acceptable toxicity rates in our preliminary study. Randomized controlled studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to detect possible advantages over current state-of-the-art RT techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.