Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38785448›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024

Highly sensitive extraction-free saliva-based molecular assay for rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.

Michael Margulis, Hanan Rohana, Oran Erster, Michal Mandelboim, Asaf Biber, Eli Schwartz, Avi Peretz, Amos Danielli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael MargulisFaculty of Engineering, The Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8987-6716
Hanan RohanaClinical Microbiology Laboratory, The Tzafon Medical Center, Poriya, Tiberias, Israel.
Oran ErsterCentral Virology Laboratory, Israel Ministry of Health, Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4839-8997
Michal MandelboimCentral Virology Laboratory, Israel Ministry of Health, Chaim Sheba Medical Centre, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Asaf BiberDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6007-0383
Eli SchwartzThe Center for Geographic Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Avi PeretzClinical Microbiology Laboratory, The Tzafon Medical Center, Poriya, Tiberias, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9012-6015
Amos DanielliFaculty of Engineering, The Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4091-0493

Funding

Israel Ministry of science and technology 101790, 3-16908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the necessity of fast, sensitive, and efficient methods to test large populations for respiratory viruses. The "gold standard" molecular assays for detecting respiratory viruses, such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and reverse transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR), rely on invasive swab samples and require time-consuming and labor-intensive extraction processes. Moreover, the turnaround time for RT-qPCR-based assays is too lengthy for rapid screening. Extraction-free saliva-based methods provide a non-invasive sampling process with a fast turnaround time and are suitable for high-throughput applications. However, when used with a standard RT-qPCR system, the absence of extraction significantly reduces the assays' sensitivity. Here, using a novel optical modulation biosensing (OMB) platform, we developed a rapid and highly sensitive extraction-free saliva-based molecular assay. We blindly tested 364 paired nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples from suspected SARS-CoV-2 cases in Israel. Compared with the gold standard swab-based RT-qPCR assay, the sensitivity of the extraction-free saliva-based OMB assay is 90.7%, much higher than the sensitivity of extraction-free saliva-based RT-qPCR assay (77.8%) with similar specificity (95.3% and 97.6%, respectively). Moreover, out of 12 samples identified by the OMB-based assay as positive, 8 samples were collected from hospitalized patients in a COVID-19 ward and were verified to be SARS-CoV-2-positive upon admission, indicating that the actual clinical sensitivity and specificity of the OMB assay are higher. Considering its user-friendly saliva-based protocol, short and cost-effective extraction-free process, and high clinical accuracy, the OMB-based molecular assay is very suitable for high-throughput testing of large populations for respiratory viruses. IMPORTANCE: Three years after the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, there are no molecular tests that combine low-cost and straightforward sample preparation, effective sample handling, minimal reagent and disposable requirements, high sensitivity, and high throughput required for mass screening. Existing rapid molecular techniques typically sacrifice certain requirements to meet others. Yet, localized outbreaks of novel viral diseases happen daily in different parts of the world. In this context, respiratory diseases are of specific importance, as they are frequently airborne and highly contagious, with the potential for a rapid global spread. The widely accepted opinion is that another pandemic is just a question of time. To ensure that the containment efforts for the upcoming "disease X" are successful, introducing rapid, high-throughput, and highly sensitive diagnostic methods for detecting and identifying pathogens is critical. A few months into the pandemic, saliva was suggested as a diagnostic matrix for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The collection of saliva does not require swabs and is minimally invasive. In particular, extraction-free saliva-based assays require fewer reagents and disposables, and therefore are faster and cheaper, offering an appealing alternative for low-income countries. Unfortunately, current extraction-free saliva-based detection methods, such as direct RT-qPCR or isothermal amplification, have either low sensitivity or low throughput. Therefore, we believe that the presented highly sensitive ht-OMBi platform and the extraction-free saliva-based molecular assay can become an essential tool in the infectious disease monitoring toolbox

Indexed as

COVID-19NasopharynxSalivaSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificityAdultAgedCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingFemaleHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesSpecimen HandlingassayCOVID-19detectiondiagnosticsextraction-freehighly sensitivehigh-throughputht-OMBiMMBoptical modulation biosensingsaliva-basedSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38785448
PMCPMC11237525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.