ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024
An exception-reporting approach for wound swab culture: effect on post-report antibiotic initiation.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a Widespread Reduction in Treatment Duration for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis on Outcomes Including Household Transmission.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- When less is more: the art of communicating clinical microbiology results.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A prior analysis suggested that wound swab culture (WSC) results were driving unnecessary antibiotic use in patients who were not already receiving treatment. As a quality-improvement initiative, our laboratory introduced an "exception-reporting" protocol on 1 March 2023, whereby typical wound pathogens susceptible to recommended empiric therapy (flucloxacillin/cefalexin) were not reported, and a comment was provided, stating no significant resistant organisms had been detected. Full results were available to clinicians on request. Cultures falling outside protocol criteria were reported in the standard fashion. This analysis sought to assess the effect of exception-reporting on post-report antibiotic initiation (PRAI). All community WSC results were matched to antibiotic dispensing records from October 2021 to December 2023. Sampling without treatment pre-report was termed "test and wait" (TaW). Following TaW, PRAI was identified if antibiotics were started within 5 days post-report. There were 1,819 and 764 WSCs received in the pre-change and post-change periods, respectively, where an initial TaW approach had been taken and an organism eligible for exception-reporting had been isolated. In the post-change period, 407 (53.3%) met the criteria and were exception-reported. PRAI occurred in 901 (49.5%) pre-change samples, compared to 102 (25.1%, IMPORTANCE: Wound swab culture is a high-volume test performed in clinical microbiology laboratories. In this analysis, we have shown that an alternative approach to reporting positive wound swab cultures has resulted in a large reduction in post-report antibiotic initiation, suggesting that the current standard method of reporting generates considerable unnecessary antibiotic use. If these findings are replicated elsewhere, wider adoption of this reporting would represent an opportunity for many clinical microbiology laboratories to have a significant impact on community antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.