Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38785337›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2024

Modulation of prey capture kinematics in relation to prey distance helps predict success.

Christopher E Oufiero, Lohitashwa Garikipati, Elizabeth McMillan, Mary Katherine Sullivan, Ryan Turnbaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher E OufieroDepartment of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-8090
Lohitashwa GarikipatiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.
Elizabeth McMillanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.
Mary Katherine SullivanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.
Ryan TurnbaughDepartment of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA.

Funding

Towson UniversityTowson University Faculty Development Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predators are not perfect, as some of their prey capture attempts result in failure. Successful attempts may be partly due to predators modulating their capture kinematics in relation to variation in the visual cues of the prey to increase the probability of success. In praying mantises, which have been suggested to possess stereoscopic vision, variation in prey distance has been shown to elicit variation in the probability of an attempt. However, it remains to be examined whether variation in prey distance results in mantises modulating their attempt to successfully capture prey. The goals of this study were to examine these relationships using the praying mantis system. Using 11 adult female Sphodromantis lineola, we recorded 192 prey capture attempts at 1000 Hz with two cameras to examine the 3D kinematics of successful and unsuccessful prey capture attempts. Using a combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and logistic regression, our results show that as prey distance increases, mantises adjust through greater and faster expansion of the forelegs and body (PC1), which significantly predicts capture success. However, PC1 only explains 22% of the variation in all prey capture attempts, suggesting that the other components may be related to additional aspects of the prey. Our results suggest that the distances at which mantises prefer to attempt to capture prey may be the result of their greater probability of successfully capturing the prey. These results highlight the range of motions mantises use when attempting to capture prey, suggesting flexibility in their prey capture attempts in relation to prey position.

Indexed as

MantodeaPredatory BehaviorAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleLogistic ModelsPrincipal Component AnalysisBehavior flexibilityPraying mantisPredation successSphodromantis lineola

Identifiers

PMID38785337
PMCPMC11213525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.