Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38785261›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

A Realist Evaluation of Social Care Practitioners' Experiences With and Understanding of Applied Healthcare Research.

Gurkiran K Birdi, Geoffrey Wong, Rachel Upthegrove, Suzanne Higgs, Annabel Walsh, Amy Ahern, Katherine Allen, Jo Howe, Hafsah Habib, Karen Nixon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gurkiran K BirdiAston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-9266-6685
Geoffrey WongUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rachel UpthegroveUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Suzanne HiggsUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Annabel WalshThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Amy AhernUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Katherine AllenBirmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Jo HoweAston University, Birmingham, UK.
Hafsah HabibAston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5910-036X
Karen NixonMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, UK.
Sheri OduolaUniversity of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Ian MaidmentAston University, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social care practitioners are often under-represented in research activity and output. Evidence-based practice enables social care practitioners to develop/engage the skills to evaluate evidence and be more actively involved in research. REalist Synthesis Of non-pharmacologicaL interVEntions for antipsychotic-induced weight gain (RESOLVE) is a NIHR-funded study where realist synthesis is used to understand and explain how, why, for whom, and in what contexts non-pharmacological interventions help service users, with severe mental illness, to manage antipsychotic-induced weight gain. Social care practitioners are a key part of the team providing care for people living with severe mental illness and therefore supporting antipsychotic-induced weight gain. The current study, RESOLVE 2, uses realist evaluation and RESOLVE as an illustrative example to help understand why and how social care practitioners engage (or not) with research. Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews will be undertaken with a purposive sample of approximately 20 social care practitioners working with people who have severe mental illness, are treated with antipsychotics, and have experienced weight gain. Participants will be recruited from NHS Trusts and recruitment avenues such as social media and personal networks. Topics discussed during interviews will include barriers and facilitators to engagement in research, current, and past engagement as well as recommendations for researchers and other practitioners. Interview recordings will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using realist evaluation which will allow in-depth causal explanations for research engagement. Better understanding of research engagement by social care practitioners will allow for evidence-based practice and better patient outcomes within these settings.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsMental DisordersEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicSocial WorkWeight GainAntipsychotic Agentsevidence-based practicerealist evaluationsevere mental illnesssocial care

Identifiers

PMID38785261
PMCPMC11127571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.