Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38785093›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2024

Mpox in children and adolescents and contact follow-up in school settings in greater Paris, France, May 2022 to July 2023.

Laura Reques, Lilas Mercuriali, Yassoungo Silué, Emilie Chazelle, Guillaume Spaccaferri, Annie Velter, Alexandra Mailles, Pierre Frange, Arnaud Tarantola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura RequesHealth Surveillance and Safety Department, Regional Health Agency in the Île-de-France Region (Agence Régionale de Santé d'Île-de-France), Saint-Denis, France.
Lilas MercurialiHealth Surveillance and Safety Department, Regional Health Agency in the Île-de-France Region (Agence Régionale de Santé d'Île-de-France), Saint-Denis, France.
Yassoungo SiluéSanté publique France regional office, Saint-Denis, France.
Emilie ChazelleSanté publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Guillaume SpaccaferriSanté publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Annie VelterSanté publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Alexandra MaillesSanté publique France, the national public health agency, Saint-Maurice, France.
Pierre FrangeInfection Control Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Necker - Enfants malades Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Arnaud TarantolaSanté publique France regional office, Saint-Denis, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDuring the 2022 mpox outbreak in Europe, primarily affecting men who have sex with men, a limited number of cases among children and adolescents were identified. Paediatric cases from outbreaks in endemic countries have been associated with a higher likelihood of severe illness. Detailed clinical case descriptions and interventions in school settings before 2022 are limited.AimTo describe clinical characteristics of mpox cases among children (< 15 years) and adolescents (15-17 years) in the greater Paris area in France, and infection control measures in schools.MethodsWe describe all notified laboratory-confirmed and non-laboratory-confirmed cases among children and adolescents identified from May 2022 to July 2023, including demographic and clinical characterisation and infection control measures in school settings, i.e. contact tracing, contact vaccination, secondary attack rate and post-exposure vaccination uptake.ResultsNineteen cases were notified (13 children, 6 adolescents). Four adolescent cases reported sexual contact before symptom onset. Ten child cases were secondary cases of adult patients; three cases were cryptic, with vesicles on hands, arms and/or legs and one case additionally presented with genitoanal lesions. Five cases attended school during their infectious period, with 160 at-risk contacts identified, and one secondary case. Five at-risk contacts were vaccinated following exposure.ConclusionCases among children and adolescents are infrequent but require a careful approach to identify the source of infection and ensure infection control measures. We advocate a 'contact warning' strategy vs 'contact tracing' in order to prevent alarm and stigma. Low post-exposure vaccination rates are expected.

Indexed as

Contact TracingDisease OutbreaksSchoolsAdolescentChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMeningococcal InfectionsMpox, MonkeypoxParisVaccinationcontact tracingMpoxpaediatricsurveillancevaccination

Identifiers

PMID38785093
PMCPMC11128737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.