Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784946›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024

Total knee arthroplasty: Quality assurance and improved longevity costs less.

Irrum Afzal, Fanuelle Getachew, Lisi Hu, Nick Clement, Philip Mitchell, Deiary Kader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Irrum AfzalSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom.
Fanuelle GetachewSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom.
Lisi HuSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom.
Nick ClementSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom.
Philip MitchellSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom.
Deiary KaderSouth West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7EG, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is an accepted variation in the financial cost of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants but it is not known whether this cost is reflected by the evidence in support of their use. A cost analysis study was carried out to determine the total cost of consumables of a TKA, and whether this was related to the supporting evidence and survivorship data. Methods: Intra-operative data for all unilateral, cemented, primary TKA over a 13 month period at a high-volume Orthopaedic Centre was collected. Level of evidence for each model was taken from the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) website, and data from the UK National Joint Registry was used to assign survivorship (failure rates). Correlation was calculated using the Spearman rank correlation (r). Results: A total of 1301 TKA were performed at the study centre during the data collection period. The mean cost of consumables for a TKA with patella resurfacing (n = 816) was £1969.08 (range of £1061.46 and £5143.89), and without resurfacing (n = 485) was £1846.62 (range of £1118.98 and £4196.81). There was a negative correlation between price of implant and ODEP rating (r = -0.47), with increasing level of evidence being associated with a lower cost. There was a positive correlation between price of implant and rate of implant failure at the1-, 3- and 5-year time-points (r = 0.55, 0.44, 0.28 respectively), with increasing cost being associated with a higher failure rate. Conclusion: Higher financial cost of TKA prostheses was associated with a weaker level of supporting evidence and a higher failure rate. The increased financial cost of new implants may be justified as more data and evidence becomes available to support an advantage in its use over currently established implants.

Indexed as

Cost analysisFailureImplantNational joint registry (NJR)Orthopaedic data evaluation panel (ODEP)Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Identifiers

PMID38784946
PMCPMC11109344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.