ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2024
Physical therapy in the Emergency Department: A prospective cohort study from an Alternatives to Opioids program.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physical therapy in the Emergency Department: A prospective cohort study from an Alternatives to Opioids program.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Musculoskeletal pain complaints are common in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of physical therapy (PT) in the ED on pain and ED return. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed with those presenting to the ED or Urgent Care at a single academic center for musculoskeletal pain between November 2020 and December 2022. All patients were referred to outpatient PT. During business hours, PT was available to begin treatment in the ED. Long-term follow-up was performed using the electronic health records. Statistical analyses included descriptive and non-parametric pairwise comparisons, Fisher's exact test, and multiple logistic regression. Results: A total of 974 patients were included in the study with 553 completing optional surveys. Back pain was most common. Pain was reduced at ED discharge for all patients, but pain was significantly improved if patients saw PT in the ED. Patients in the ED were less likely to keep their outpatient PT appointments than others, but importantly, patients who saw PT in the ED were less likely to return to the ED for the same complaint up to 1 year later. Those who kept PT appointments were likely to establish or maintain healthcare outside emergency services later. Conclusions: Initiating PT in this ED reduces pain at ED discharge. However, patients who utilized PT were more likely to later utilize health care resources outside of emergency services. Those who saw PT in this ED were less likely to return to the ED for the same complaint up to 1 year later.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.