Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784677›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2024

A comprehensive investigation of clustering algorithms for User and Entity Behavior Analytics.

Pierpaolo Artioli, Antonio Maci, Alessio Magrì

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pierpaolo ArtioliCybersecurity Laboratory, BV TECH S.p.A., Milan, Italy.
Antonio MaciCybersecurity Laboratory, BV TECH S.p.A., Milan, Italy.
Alessio MagrìCybersecurity Laboratory, BV TECH S.p.A., Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Government agencies are now encouraging industries to enhance their security systems to detect and respond proactively to cybersecurity incidents. Consequently, equipping with a security operation center that combines the analytical capabilities of human experts with systems based on Machine Learning (ML) plays a critical role. In this setting, Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platforms can effectively handle network-related events to trigger cybersecurity alerts. Furthermore, a SIEM may include a User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) engine that examines the behavior of both users and devices, or entities, within a corporate network. Methods: In recent literature, several contributions have employed ML algorithms for UEBA, especially those based on the unsupervised learning paradigm, because anomalous behaviors are usually not known in advance. However, to shorten the gap between research advances and practice, it is necessary to comprehensively analyze the effectiveness of these methodologies. This paper proposes a thorough investigation of traditional and emerging clustering algorithms for UEBA, considering multiple application contexts, i.e., different user-entity interaction scenarios. Results and discussion: Our study involves three datasets sourced from the existing literature and fifteen clustering algorithms. Among the compared techniques, HDBSCAN and DenMune showed promising performance on the state-of-the-art CERT behavior-related dataset, producing groups with a density very close to the number of users.

Indexed as

clusteringdata analyticsmachine learningUEBAunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID38784677
PMCPMC11112065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.