Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784650›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

The Effect of Family Nursing Conversations as an Add-on to Multidisciplinary Treatment in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: A Quasi-Experimental Trial.

Pernille Friis Rønne, Bente Appel Esbensen, Anne Brødsgaard, Lasse Østergaard Andersen, Bo-Biering Sørensen, Carrinna Aviaja Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pernille Friis RønneThe Multidisciplinary Pain Center and Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Respiratory Support, The Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-7482
Bente Appel EsbensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-8221
Anne BrødsgaardDepartment of People and Technology, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-9480
Lasse Østergaard AndersenCopenhagen Pain Clinic, Copenhagen, SV, Denmark.
Bo-Biering SørensenCRPS Clinic, Department of Neurology, The Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.
Carrinna Aviaja HansenDepartment of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-6997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a lifelong condition with radical consequences, calling for management involving patients' families. Interventions based on the family systems nursing framework by Wright and Leahey have proved beneficial in other populations but require investigation in a CNCP population. This trial assumed that family nursing conversations (FNCs) based on the family systems nursing framework would increase patients' and family members' self-efficacy concerning CNCP management. Objective: To investigate whether an intervention with FNCs as an add-on to the usual multidisciplinary treatment of CNCP would have an effect on patients' and family members' self-efficacy. Additionally, to investigate any impact on family function, health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Methods: The trial applied a prospective non-blinded quasi-experimental design with two comparable groups of patients and family members: a historical control group (HCG) and an intervention group (IG). The intervention was executed by nurses employed at a multidisciplinary pain center in the Capital Region of Denmark. HCG data were collected before the nurses' intervention training. The primary outcome was self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes were family function, health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Results: In total, 58 patients and 85 family members were included. The primary outcome, self-efficacy, detected no statistically significant between-group differences in mean change for patients, Conclusion: The intervention had no effect on patients' or family members' self-efficacy but a positive effect on patients' behavioral family function and anxiety. The intervention was deeply affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Hence, any results should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

experimental designfamily caregivingpainresearchself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID38784650
PMCPMC11113041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.