Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784574›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Physical frailty identification using machine learning to explore the 5-item FRAIL scale, Cardiovascular Health Study index, and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index.

Chen-Cheng Yang, Po-Hong Chen, Cheng-Hong Yang, Chia-Yen Dai, Kuei-Hau Luo, Tzu-Hua Chen, Hung-Yi Chuang, Chao-Hung Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chen-Cheng YangGraduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Po-Hong ChenDepartment of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hong YangDepartment of Information Management, Tainan University of Technology, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chia-Yen DaiDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Kuei-Hau LuoDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hua ChenDepartment of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Hung-Yi ChuangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Chao-Hung KuoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical frailty is an important issue in aging societies. Three models of physical frailty assessment, the 5-Item fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness and loss of weight (FRAIL); Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS); and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) indices, have been regularly used in clinical and research studies. However, no previous studies have investigated the predictive ability of machine learning (ML) for physical frailty assessment. The aim was to use two ML algorithms, random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), to predict these three physical frailty assessment models. Materials and methods: Questionnaires regarding demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, living environment, and physical frailty assessment were answered by 445 participants aged 60 years and above. The RF and XGBoost algorithms were used to assess their scores for the three physical frailty indices. Furthermore, feature importance and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used to determine the important physical frailty factors. Results: The XGBoost algorithm obtained higher accuracy for predicting the three physical frailty indices; the areas under the curve obtained by the XGBoost algorithm for the 5-Item FRAIL, CHS, and SOF indices were 0.84. 0.79, and 0.69, respectively. The feature importance and SHAP of the XGBoost algorithm revealed that systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, and body mass index play important roles in all three physical frailty models. Conclusion: The XGBoost algorithm has a more accurate predictive rate than RF across all three physical frailty assessments. Thus, ML can be a useful tool for the early detection of physical frailty.

Indexed as

FrailtyGeriatric AssessmentMachine LearningOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesmachine learningmodelphysical frailtypredictionXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID38784574
PMCPMC11112059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.