ArticleHeliyon2024
Residents' preferences for urban agriculture in Shanghai.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although urban agriculture (UA) has been gaining greater attention as part of an effort toward sustainable urban development in China, empirical knowledge is limited. We conducted a discrete choice experiment with 756 residents of Shanghai. Overall, the results indicate that respondents supported UA as they tended to favor one of the UA scenarios presented. Residents prefer UA facilities that utilize environmentally friendly production, offer farming activities, and are equipped with dining facilities. Regularly scheduled educational activities hosted by UA facilities are preferred to those on an irregular basis. In terms of location, residents prefer UA facilities that are close by but do not necessarily want UA facilities to be right in front of them. There is a stronger preference for UA among highly educated populations, those with primary and secondary school students, and those with agricultural work experience. Additionally, various UA attributes affect residents' preferences; overall, there is a high degree of homogeneity in residents' preferences for various UA attributes. The marginal willingness to pay value is slightly higher than expected among the estimation results. There are three reasons for this outcome: the characteristics of UA as a recreational facility in China, the relatively high price level in Shanghai, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.