ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2023
Radiographic Evaluation of Impacted Third Mandibular Molar According to the Classification of Winter, Pell and Gregory in a Sample of Cameroonian Population.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of coenzyme Q10 on post-extraction tissue healing in wisdom tooth Surgery: double-blind randomized clinical trial.Pain management · 2025Trial
- Beyond Side-Specific Distributions: Patient-Level Bilateral Agreement of Mandibular Third-Molar Classifications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association of mandibular third molar positions, ramus height, and gonial angle on panoramic radiographs: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on the management of third molar health.International journal of oral science · 2026Review
- Prevalence of impacted and supernumerary teeth among young Peruvians: A large cross-sectional study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- One-plate versus two-plate fixation in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a retrospective two-centre comparative study.Head & face medicine · 2025Observational
- The Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser in the Extraction of Impacted Third Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- [Radiographic evaluation of the mandibular third molar and their influence on the pathologies of the mandibular second molar. A cross-sectional study].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The extraction of impacted third molars (M3) is a common surgical procedure in dentistry and oral surgery. Various complications, including inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) damage, may occur during and after extraction of this tooth. Radiographic examination should provide information about the M3 itself, but also about the surrounding bony structure and the relationship of the roots to the IAN and the adjacent second molar, which is often traumatized during this extraction. The aim of our study was to evaluate the depth and angulation of impacted mandibular third molars (M3) from panoramic radiographs, according to the classifications proposed by Winter and Pell & Gregory. Methods: Radiographic signs present on the orthopantomogram showing M3 depth, and retromandibular available space according to the Pell & Gregory classification were evaluated. Evaluation of the M3 angulation relative to the M2 according to Winter's classification was also done. Student's t test was used to determine the association between side or sex and different variables. Results: The depth of impaction of the M3 crown was level A accounting for 54.4% (n=260) of the PR while level B constituted 35.7% (n=171) of the images. Regarding the availability of retromandibular space, Class I constituted 36.8% (n=176). The Class II accounted for 55.9% (n=267) of PR. Conclusion: Our study showed that 54.4% of M3 were located at the same level as the occlusal plane of the second molar, while in 56% of PR the space between the second molar and the ramus of the mandible is less than the mesiodistal diameter of the third molar. This research showed that 23.1% of M3 had a level of vertical angulation, a level that allows for less painful luxation of the impacted molars. These results seem to show a relatively high level of difficulty in mobilizing and extracting M3 from Cameroonian patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.