ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2024
Validity study of the Japanese version of the Nijmegen Questionnaire for verifying dysfunctional breathing in Japanese asthma patients.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dysfunctional breathing mimicking asthma exacerbation with acute hypoxemia: a case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a clinical condition characterized by irregular breathing patterns presenting a sensation of dyspnea and a feeling of chest tightness. DB is a known comorbidity of asthma that is difficult to control, leading to poor quality of life, so early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are essential to improve the clinical condition of asthma. The Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ), developed to screen for DB and translated into various languages, is used worldwide. However, a Japanese NQ (JNQ) is unavailable, so DB has not been clinically verified in people with asthma in Japan. Objective: This study aimed to prepare a JNQ, verify its reliability and validity, and demonstrate its clinical benefits in asthma treatment. Methods: The JNQ was prepared by back-translating the NQ with the author's consent. The answers to self-administered questionnaires, including the JNQ, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ), and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), were obtained with the consent of 68 people with asthma (average age ± SD, 52.04 ± 12.43 years) who visited Nihon University Itabashi Hospital. The reliability of the JNQ was analyzed by the Cronbach alpha coefficient. A comparative test was conducted for each questionnaire (ACT, ACQ, Mini-AQLQ, PHQ-9), considering a JNQ score of 23 as the cutoff value. Patients with a score of 23 or more were assigned to the DB group, whereas patients with a score of less than 23 were assigned to the non-DB group. We analyzed the correlation between the JNQ and each questionnaire. Results: The JNQ showed sufficient reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.875). Correlation analysis between the JNQ score and each questionnaire revealed negative correlations with the ACT score ( Conclusions: The JNQ validates DB in Japanese people with asthma and reflects the deterioration of asthma control, decreased quality of life, and depression. Using the JNQ, early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention (eg, breathing exercises and a psychosomatic approach) for DB in people with asthma may help suppress the severity of asthma in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.