ArticleCureus2024
The Impact of Multileaf Collimator Size on Single Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arcs-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the plan quality of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 2.5-mm and 5-mm multileaf collimator (MLC) and investigate the factors' influence on the differences by MLC size.
methodsSeventy-six treatment plans including 145 targets calculated with a single isocenter multiple noncoplanar dynamic conformal arc (DCA) technique using automatic multiple brain metastases (MBM) treatment planning system. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), lesion underdosage volume factor (LUF), healthy tissue overdose volume factor (HTOF), geometric conformity index (g), and mean dose to normal organs were compared between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC. Then the factors that influenced the differences of these parameters were investigated. The impact of target size was also investigated for CI and GI values of individual targets (n=145), and differences between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC were analyzed.
resultsAll parameters except for LUF were significantly better in plans with 2.5 mm MLC. Target size was a significant factor for difference in HTOF, and distance between targets was a significant factor for difference in brain dose and GI. Among 145 metastases, the average inverse CI was 1.35 and 1.47 with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC, respectively (p<0.001). The average GI was 3.21 and 3.53, respectively (p<0.001). For individual targets, target size was a significant factor in CI and GI both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC (p-value: <0.001, each). CI and GI were significantly better with 2.5-mm than 5-mm MLC. CI was almost >0.67 except for ≤5mm targets with 5-mm MLC. Also, GI was almost smaller than 3.0 for >10 mm targets both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC.
conclusionsMBM with 5-mm MLC was almost fine. However, it may be better to use a conservative margin for larger metastases. It may also be better to avoid SRS with 5-mm MLC for patients with ≤5 mm target size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.