Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784266›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024

Effective factors in planning, implementation, and management of educational program evaluation in medical sciences: A practical guide.

Mahla Salajegheh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mahla SalajeghehDepartment of Medical Education, Medical Education Development Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEducational program evaluation is a complex issue, and it is essential to have knowledge of the potential challenges and solutions during the whole process. The present study aimed to identify the influential components in planning, implementation, and evaluation management of educational programs in medical sciences and then provide an applied guide to guarantee the best possible evaluation by evaluators of educational programs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis descriptive study was conducted in three steps. First, the effective components in planning, implementation, and evaluation management of educational programs in medical sciences were reviewed. Second, experts' opinion was asked through a focus group discussion regarding the mentioned components. Third, regarding the complied applied guide, the opinions of 40 medical educationist and program evaluation experts were investigated using a checklist.

resultsAn applied guide for planning, implementation, and evaluation management of educational programs in medical sciences consists of eight stages: determining the evaluation questions and standards, determining the type of information required, determining resources to collect information, determining methods and tools to collect information, determining data analysis methods, determining the timing and frequency of reporting, determining the appropriate ways of reporting, and determining strategies to maintain the cooperation of data sources.

conclusionThe spread of educational programs in medical sciences universities leads to an increasing need for program evaluation to provide evidence of their effectiveness and improvement. The present research provided an applied guide to make the evaluation of educational programs feasible by using a set of concepts, principles, methods, theories, and models.

Indexed as

Evaluationguidemedical educationprogram

Identifiers

PMID38784266
PMCPMC11114481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.