ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Neurological dysfunction screening in a cohort of adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a six-year follow-up.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Promising predictors of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is one of the most insidious microvascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and initial signs may appear during childhood. The aim of this study is to evaluate associations between the Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) outcomes at enrollment with neuropathy screening questionnaires performed six years later in a cohort of asymptomatic adolescents followed up until early adulthood, affected by T1DM. Methods: We performed NCS in a cohort of seventy-two adolescents with T1DM and eighteen healthy controls. Six years later, screening questionnaires for DN were proposed: Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI, specific for symptoms of somatic dysfunction), Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS 31, specific for abnormalities of the autonomic component) and Clarke questionnaire (perception of hypoglycemia). Thirty-two TD1M subjects agreed to participate in the follow-up; main clinical-metabolic parameters, including the number of episodes of hypoglycemia in the past twelve months, were collected. Results: 11.8% of subjects showed changes compatible with DN through the MNSI questionnaire, while 41% declared a reduced perception of hypoglycemia on the Clarke questionnaire. No significant correlation was observed between the clinical-metabolic parameters or altered response to NCS and scores of MNSI and COMPASS 31 questionnaires. On the other hand, an association was observed between NCS abnormalities and a high number of hypoglycemic events after six years (97-fold increased risk, Conclusion: The frequency of somatic alterations in the study population is 11.8%, whereas the frequency of symptoms correlated with autonomic damage is about 41%. An autonomic impairment recorded at NCS may represent a six-year risk factor for increased hypoglycemic episodes, even if more extensive studies are needed to investigate this possible relationship further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.