Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784234›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Exploring the gap: attitudes, knowledge, and training needs in complementary and integrative medicine among healthcare professionals at German university hospitals.

Daniela Hesmert, Carina Klocke, Regina Stolz, Roman Huber, Yvonne Samstag, Katrin Hübner, Thomas Simmet, Tatiana Syrovets, Stefanie Joos, Jan Valentini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniela Hesmert *Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Carina Klocke *Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Regina StolzInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Roman HuberCenter for Complementary Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine - University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Yvonne SamstagSection of Molecular Immunology, Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin HübnerSection of Molecular Immunology, Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SimmetInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacology of Natural Products, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tatiana SyrovetsInstitute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacology of Natural Products, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Jan ValentiniInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of Complementary and Integrative Medicine (CIM) is very popular among the general population in Germany. However, international studies show that nurses, physicians, and other health care professionals (HCPs) at hospitals often do not feel sufficiently informed about different CIM approaches. Moreover, they do not feel trained enough to counsel their patients appropriately. In the German-speaking context, particularly within university hospitals, research on this subject is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this explorative study was to evaluate attitudes, subjective knowledge, and needs regarding CIM among HCPs with direct patient interaction across all four university hospitals in the federal state of Baden-Württemberg, Germany (Tübingen, Ulm, Freiburg, Heidelberg). Methods: The multicenter, cross-sectional, anonymous full survey was conducted online using a self-developed, semi-structured, web-based questionnaire. Recruitment took place via all-inclusive e-mail distribution lists of all four university hospitals. Results: A total of Discussion: This comprehensive survey of health care professionals (HCPs) at university hospitals in Germany reveals a clearly positive disposition toward CIM, aligning with findings from other hospital-based surveys and highlighting differences among professional groups. While most therapies deemed beneficial for patient care are supported by positive evidence, further research is required for others. Given the average self-reported knowledge of CIM, targeted education is essential to meet the needs of both HCPs and patients and to ensure the provision of evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of CIM.

Indexed as

attitudecomplementary medicineGermanyhealthcare professionalintegrative medicineknowledgeneedsuniversity hospital

Identifiers

PMID38784234
PMCPMC11111851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.