Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784212›Full record

Trial reportEthiopian journal of health sciences2023

Comparison of the Efficacy of Tolterodine versus Oxybutynin in the Treatment of Children with Desmopressin-Resistant Enuresis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Neda Ezodin, MahboubehJafari Sarouei, Mohamad Khademlo, Sevda Hashemi Milani, Sahar Yousefi, Hamid Mohammadjafari

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Neda EzodinDepartment of pediatrics, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari Iran.
MahboubehJafari SaroueiPediatric infectious diseases research center, communicable Diseases institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari Iran.
Mohamad KhademloMazandaranUniversity of Medical Sciences, Sari Iran.
Sevda Hashemi MilaniDepartment of pediatrics, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari Iran.
Sahar YousefiDepartment of pediatrics, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari Iran.
Hamid MohammadjafariPediatric infectious diseases research center, communicable Diseases institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Enuresis, defined as involuntary nocturnal urination without any underlying organic disorder in a child expected to control urination, poses a common problem. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Tolterodine and Oxybutynin in children presenting with primary desmopressin-resistant enuresis. Materials and Methods: A randomized clinical trial was undertaken involving 68 participants aged between 5 and 16 years, all suffering from primary enuresis. These patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups for a three-month period: Group 1, treated with Oxybutynin and Desmopressin, and Group 2, treated with Tolterodine and Desmopressin. Data on demographics, clinical and laboratory findings, and subjective responses to treatment were gathered. The response was measured based on the frequency of wetting incidents per night and week and compared with pre-treatment data. Results: Patients were divided into two groups (30 patients in Group 1 and 38 patients in Group 2). The mean age of the patients was 88.97±27.09 months. In the first treatment group, 6 out of 30 patients (20%) experienced a complete treatment response, as did 5 out of 38 patients (13.2%) in the second treatment group. This difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Seven patients (23%) in the Oxybutynin group and 13 patients (34%) in the Tolterodine group reported a lack of response to treatment, a difference that also lacked statistical significance. Conclusion: For patients resistant to Desmopressin, the addition of anticholinergic drugs elicited a significant response in over half of the patients. However, no benefit was observed in using either Oxybutynin or Tolterodine in the treatment of Desmopressin-resistant enuresis.

Indexed as

Deamino Arginine VasopressinMandelic AcidsTolterodine TartrateAdolescentAntidiuretic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug ResistanceEnuresisFemaleHumansMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsNocturnal EnuresisTreatment OutcomeUrological AgentsAntidiuretic AgentsDeamino Arginine VasopressinMandelic AcidsMuscarinic AntagonistsoxybutyninTolterodine TartrateUrological AgentsDesmopressinEnuresisOxybutyninTolterodine

Identifiers

PMID38784212
PMCPMC11111179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.