ArticleBrain & spine2024
Transmission of slow waves in Masimo O
Article in Brain & spine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the utility of near-infrared spectroscopy-derived measures for assessing cerebrovascular autoregulation: results from an observational cohort study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Untangling discrepancies between cerebrovascular autoregulation correlation coefficients: An exploration of filters, coherence and power.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cerebral autoregulation (CA) dysfunction is a key complication following brain injury. CA assessment using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) offers a promising alternative to the current non-invasive standard, cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) measured with transcranial Doppler. Research question: Can autoregulatory slow waves (frequency range 0.005-0.05 Hz) associated with spontaneous and induced changes in ABP in healthy volunteers be detected by parameters measured with the Masimo O Methods: ABP, CBFV and Masimo O Results: At baseline, slow waves were detected with sufficient power that substantially exceeded the signals' measurement resolution in all parameters except cerebral oxygen saturation. During ABP oscillations in the 0.033 Hz range (induced by squat/stand), the power of slow waves increased in all parameters in a similar pattern, with total (cHb) and oxygenated (O Conclusion: Spontaneous fluctuations in ABP can be observed in analysed Masimo O
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.