ArticleHuman reproduction open2024
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in women with previous breast cancer: a nationwide study of singleton births 1973-2017.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reproductive outcomes of pregnancy after breast cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Assessment of clinical and biological characteristics by pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Late endocrine-metabolic complications in survivors of young adult and adult-onset cancers: comprehensive evaluation and strategies for management. An Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD), Italian Society of Diabetology (SID), Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) multidisciplinary critical review.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are the obstetric and perinatal outcomes in births to breast cancer survivors compared to women without previous breast cancer? SUMMARY ANSWER: Women who conceived during the first 2 years following a breast cancer diagnosis had a higher risk for preterm birth, induced delivery, and cesarean section, while no increased risks were observed in births conceived later than 2 years after a breast cancer diagnosis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A recent meta-analysis found higher risks of cesarean section, preterm birth, low birthweight, and small for gestational age in pregnancies among breast cancer survivors. Less is known about rarer outcomes such as pre-eclampsia or congenital malformations. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: We conducted a population-based matched cohort study including all breast cancer survivors who gave birth to singletons 1973-2017 in Sweden, identified through linkage between the Swedish Cancer Register, the Medical Birth Register, and the National Quality Register for Breast Cancer. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTINGS
methodsEach birth following breast cancer (n = 926) was matched by maternal age at delivery, parity, and calendar year at delivery to 100 births in a comparator cohort of women (n = 92 490). Conditional logistic and multinomial regression models estimated relative risks (RR) with 95% CI. Subgroup analyses by time since diagnosis and type of treatment were performed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Previous breast cancer was associated with higher risks of induced delivery (RR; 1.3, 1.0-1.6), very preterm birth (RR; 1.8, 1.1-3.0), and planned preterm birth (RR; 1.6, 1.0-2.4). Women who conceived within 1 year after breast cancer diagnosis had higher risks of cesarean section (RR; 1.7, 1.0-2.7), very preterm birth (RR; 5.3, 1.9-14.8), and low birthweight (RR; 2.7, 1.4-5.2), while the risks of induced delivery (RR; 1.8, 1.1-2.9), moderately preterm birth (RR; 2.1, 1.2-3.7), and planned preterm birth (RR; 2.5, 1.1-5.7) were higher in women who conceived during the second year after diagnosis. Women who conceived later than 2 years after breast cancer diagnosis had similar obstetric risks to their comparators. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: As information on the end date of treatment was unavailable, the time between the date of diagnosis and conception was used as a proxy, which does not fully capture the effect of time since end of treatment. In addition, treatments and clinical recommendations have changed over the long study period, which may impact childbearing patterns in breast cancer survivors. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsRisks of adverse obstetric outcomes in breast cancer survivors were confined to births conceived within 2 years of diagnosis. As family building holds significance for numerous young breast cancer patients, these findings are particularly important to inform both breast cancer survivors and clinicians about future reproductive outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society (grant number 22-2044 Pj A.L.V.J.), Karolinska Institutet Foundations (grant number: 2022-01696 F.E.L., 2022-01559 A.L.V.J.), and the Swedish Research Council (grant number: 2021-01657 A.L.V.J.). K.A.R.-W. is supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (20 0170 F) and the Radiumhemmets Research Foundations for clinical researchers 2020-2026. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.