Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784053›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Expert review of child and caregiver critiques of a therapeutic guided imagery therapy mobile application targeting disorders of gut-brain interaction in children.

John M Hollier, Tiantá A Strickland, C Michael Fordis, Robert J Shulman, Debbe Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John M HollierTexas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3296-5240
Tiantá A StricklandDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
C Michael FordisCenter for Collaborative and Interactive Technologies, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert J ShulmanTexas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Debbe ThompsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Tissue Analysis & Molecular Imaging CoreP30DK056338 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Hashem B El-Serag · 2001 to 2026
$28.3M
PATHWAYS TO NEW BIOMARKERS IN RECURRENT ABDOMINAL PAIN IN CHILDRENR01NR013497 · NINR · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SAVIDGE, TOR C. · 2012 to 2024
$4.7M
DO BIOMARKERS PREDICT RESPONSE TO A PEDIATRIC CHRONIC PAIN SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT PROGRAM?R01NR016786 · NINR · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LEVY, RONA L., SHULMAN, ROBERT J · 2018 to 2023
$2.9M
A New Paradigm for Treating Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders in ChildrenK23DK120928 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI HOLLIER, JOHN M · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK120928NIDDK NIH HHS L40 DK122430NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056338NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013497NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A guided imagery therapy mobile application (GIT App) is a novel platform for treating children with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Previous feedback from child/caregiver dyads suggested modifications for our App prototype. However, their feedback had the potential to affect the intervention's efficacy. Thus, we aimed to have their critiques vetted by relevant experts prior to further App refinement. Objective: Compare expert reviews of the GIT App with end-users' (i.e., child/caregiver dyads') feedback. Methods: This mixed-methods study with experts included a hands-on App evaluation, a survey assessing usability, and focus groups comparing their perspectives with those previously provided by end-users. Results: Eight medical and technology experts were enrolled. Their average usability survey score of the GIT App was 69.0 ± 27.7, which was marginally above the 50th percentile. While the expert and end-user usability assessments were generally favorable, both groups agreed that the App's reminder notification feature location was not intuitive, detracting from its usability. Experts agreed with end-users that the App's aesthetics were acceptable and suggested increasing icon and font sizes. Like the end-users, the experts did not achieve consensus regarding the ideal session length or inclusion of background sounds and screen animations. Lastly, the experts agreed with end-users that gamification techniques (e.g., gift cards and virtual badges) would promote user engagement. Conclusion: An expert review of our therapeutic App revealed findings consistent with end-users and provided insight for modifying the interface and GIT sessions. Based on this experience, we recommend expert vetting of end-user suggestions as a routine checkpoint when developing therapeutic Apps.

Indexed as

Disorders of gut–brain interactionfunctional abdominal pain disordersguided imagery therapymixed-methods researchmobile applicationpediatricsuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID38784053
PMCPMC11113049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.