Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38784047›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024

Biomarker patterns in patients with cardiogenic shock versus septic shock.

Elma J Peters, Martin S Frydland, Christian Hassager, Lieuwe D J Bos, Lonneke A van Vught, Olaf L Cremer, Jacob E Møller, Bert-Jan H van den Born, Alexander P J Vlaar, Jose P S Henriques and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elma J PetersDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Martin S FrydlandDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian HassagerDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lieuwe D J BosIntensive Care, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lonneke A van VughtDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Olaf L CremerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jacob E MøllerDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bert-Jan H van den BornDepartment of Internal/vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine & Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jose P S HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
MARS consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In cardiogenic shock (CS), contractile failure is often accompanied by a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In contrast, many patients with septic shock (SS) develop cardiac dysfunction. A similar hemodynamic support strategy is often deployed in both syndromes but it is unclear whether this is justified based on profiles of biomarkers expressing neurohormonal activation and cardiovascular stress. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter cohort, 111 patients with acute myocardial infarction related CS were identified, and matched to patients with SS. Clinical parameters were collected and blood samples were obtained on day 1-3 of Intensive Care admission. Results: In this shock cohort comprising 222 patients, with a mean age of 61 (±13.5) years and of whom 161 (37 %) were male, we found that despite obvious clinical disparities on admission, mortality at 30-days did not differ (CS: 40.5 % vs. SS 43.1 %, p = 0.56). Overall, plasma concentrations of all biomarkers were higher in SS patients, with the largest difference on the first day. However, only in CS patients the biomarker concentrations were associated with mortality. Conclusion: In this prospective, multicenter cohort SS and CS patients showed similarities in baseline conditions and had similar mortality. However, several biomarkers only showed prognostic value in CS.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCardiogenic shockMortalitySeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID38784047
PMCPMC11112335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.