Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783910›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2024

The diagnostic yield of repeat computed tomography angiography in cases of spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage after negative initial digital subtraction angiography.

Amonlaya Amantakul, Withawat Vuthiwong, Natthapong Khiawsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amonlaya AmantakulDepartment of Radiology, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Withawat VuthiwongDepartment of Radiology, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Natthapong KhiawsaDepartment of Radiology, Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: It is currently unclear how useful repeat computed tomography angiography (CTA) is in spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) patients after negative initial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The purpose of this study is to assess the yield of repeat CTA for the detection of causative vascular lesions in patients with SAH in whom there has been a negative initial DSA. Material and methods: This observational retrospective study was carried out from January 2013 to July 2022 at a single institution. Analysis of the SAH pattern on unenhanced CT showed that patients were divided into perimesencephalic SAH and diffuse SAH groups. A repeat CTA was performed on all spontaneous SAH patients who had a nega-tive initial CTA and DSA within a 2-week period. An interventional neuroradiologist and a diagnostic radiologist examined all images to search for causative vascular abnormalities. Results: Forty-seven patients were included in our study, with a median age of 55 years and a range of 28-81 years. Thirty-seven had diffuse SAH (66%), and 16 had perimesencephalic SAH (34%). The repeat CTA revealed 2 causa-tive vascular lesions (a right PICA aneurysm and a mycotic aneurysm) in 2 separate patients (yield of 4.3%), both of whom had diffuse SAH (yield of 6.5%). In retrospect, none of these vascular lesions were evident in the initial CTA and DSA. No evidence of re-bleeding was observed in the follow-up period. Conclusions: It is beneficial to repeat CTA when evaluating patients with diffuse SAH who initially present with nega-tive initial DSA. For occult aneurysms, the diagnostic yield of the follow-up CTA is 6.5%.

Indexed as

computed tomography angiographydigital subtraction angiographysubarachnoid haemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID38783910
PMCPMC11112413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.