Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783767›Full record

ArticlePerfusion2025

Flow capabilities of arterial and drainage cannulae during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A simulation model.

Avishka Wickramarachchi, Aidan J C Burrell, Patrick R Joyce, Rinaldo Bellomo, Jaishankar Raman, Shaun D Gregory, Andrew F Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Avishka WickramarachchiCardio-Respiratory Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-7009
Aidan J C BurrellDepartment of Intensive Care, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Patrick R JoyceDepartment of Intensive Care, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jaishankar RamanCardiothoracic Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin & St Vincent's Hospitals, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shaun D GregoryCardio-Respiratory Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andrew F StephensCardio-Respiratory Engineering and Technology Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundLarge cannulae can increase cannula-related complications during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). Conversely, the ability for small cannulae to provide adequate support is poorly understood. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate a range of cannula sizes and VA ECMO flow rates in a simulated patient under various disease states.MethodsArterial cannulae sizes between 13 and 21 Fr and drainage cannula sizes between 21 and 25 Fr were tested in a VA ECMO circuit connected to a mock circulation loop simulating a patient with severe left ventricular failure. Systemic and pulmonary hypertension, physiologically normal, and hypotension were simulated by varying systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances (SVR and PVR, respectively). All cannula combinations were evaluated against all combinations of SVR, PVR, and VA ECMO flow rates.ResultsA 15 Fr arterial cannula combined with a 21 Fr drainage cannula could provide >4 L/min of total flow and a mean arterial pressure of 81.1 mmHg. Changes in SVR produced marked changes to all measured parameters, while changes to PVR had minimal effect. Larger drainage cannulae only increased maximum circuit flow rates when combined with larger arterial cannulae.ConclusionSmaller cannulae and lower flow rates could sufficiently support the simulated patient under various disease states. We found arterial cannula size and SVR to be key factors in determining the flow-delivering capabilities for any given VA ECMO circuit. Overall, our results challenge the notion that larger cannulae and high flows must be used to achieve adequate ECMO support.

Indexed as

CannulaDrainageExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationModels, CardiovascularComputer SimulationHumanscannula sizeECPRlimb ischemiamock circulatory loopreturn cannulaVA ECMOvascular injuryvenous cannula

Identifiers

PMID38783767
PMCPMC11951468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.