Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783684›Full record

SynthesisESC heart failure2024

Pulmonary artery denervation versus conventional therapies for PAH: a systematic review and updated network meta-analysis.

Xiaoyu Wu, Xiang Wang, Longyao Zhang, Zoucheng Pan, Feng Chen, Shao-Liang Chen, Jing Kan, Yongyue Wei

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoyu WuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Center of Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Center of Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Longyao ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Center of Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zoucheng PanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Center of Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Feng ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Center of Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shao-Liang ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, The Affiliated Nanjing Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jing KanDepartment of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, The Affiliated Nanjing Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yongyue WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Center of Global Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA recent guideline presented by the ESC Congress in 2022 had indicated a novel therapy targeted at pulmonary artery hypertension, known as pulmonary artery denervation (PADN), which get inspired from a laboratorial trial that could lowering the pulmonary artery pressure through the intervention on the animals. Our aim is to conduct a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PADN from six aspects with the current conventional therapies. METHODS AND

resultsAccording to the PRISMA guidance, databases including Ovid, ClinicalTrials.gov, Medline, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 22 August 2023, along with a full assessment of the previous five meta-analyses. Data were extracted and curated for Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the change in the 6-min walking distance (6MWD) from baseline with a secondary outcome called change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) from baseline. The four safety outcomes included risk of clinical worsening, hospitalization, mortality and severe adverse events (SAEs). The comparison is structured on a contrast model based on 65 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PADN and the other conventional mainstream drugs. PADN had a better effect in improving 6MWD than Placebo (-77.76 m, 95% CI: -102.04 to -54.34 m), Macitentan (-65.32 m, 95% CI: -95.34 to -36.1 m), Bosentan (-64.5 m, 95% CI: -94.7 to -35.07 m), Iloprost (-62.66 m, 95% CI: -99.48 to -27.13 m), Oxygen (-62.42 m, 95% CI: -100.01 to -25.78 m), Treprostinil (-62.01 m, 95% CI: -89.04 to -35.61 m), Riociguat (-60.59 m, 95% CI: -86.11 to -35.98 m), Selexipag (-47.2 m, 95% CI: -85.61 to -10.19 m), Sildenafil (-44.92 m, 95% CI: -74.43 to -16.15 m), or Sitaxsentan (-39.53 m, 95% CI: -78.99 to -0.76 m). PADN had a better antihypertensive effect than placebo and showed statistical significant lower risks to induce clinical worsening and re-hospitalization than treprostinil, riociguat, and placebo groups. No statistically significant difference in risk of mortality and severe adverse events was observed between PADN versus the other interventions.

conclusionsCompared with 16 types of conventional therapies and Placebo, PADN has advantage over nine single therapies and Placebo in improving 6MWD and appears to be better than two types of dual-drug combined therapies while with no statistical significance. PADN shows a favourable antihypertensive effect on mPAP and has a lower risk to trigger clinical worsening or hospitalization, while its risk on mortality and severe adverse events is still inconclusive.

Indexed as

DenervationPulmonary Arterial HypertensionPulmonary ArteryAntihypertensive AgentsHumansAntihypertensive Agents6MWDmPAPnetwork meta‐analysisPADNPAH

Identifiers

PMID38783684
PMCPMC11424296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.