Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783588›Full record

ReviewFEBS open bio2024

Is allostery a fuzzy concept?

Veronica Morea, Francesco Angelucci, Andrea Bellelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS open bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veronica MoreaInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, CNR, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2566-3049
Francesco AngelucciDepartment of Life, Health, and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Italy.
Andrea BellelliDepartment of Biochemical Sciences "A. Rossi Fanelli", Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-6048

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione e del Merito 2017483NH8_05Regione Lazio A0375-2020-365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allostery is an important property of biological macromolecules which regulates diverse biological functions such as catalysis, signal transduction, transport, and molecular recognition. However, the concept was expressed using two different definitions by J. Monod and, over time, more have been added by different authors, making it fuzzy. Here, we reviewed the different meanings of allostery in the current literature and found that it has been used to indicate that the function of a protein is regulated by heterotropic ligands, and/or that the binding of ligands and substrates presents homotropic positive or negative cooperativity, whatever the hypothesized or demonstrated reaction mechanism might be. Thus, proteins defined to be allosteric include not only those that obey the two-state concerted model, but also those that obey different reaction mechanisms such as ligand-induced fit, possibly coupled to sequential structure changes, and ligand-linked dissociation-association. Since each reaction mechanism requires its own mathematical description and is defined by it, there are many possible 'allosteries'. This lack of clarity is made even fuzzier by the fact that the reaction mechanism is often assigned imprecisely and/or implicitly in the absence of the necessary experimental evidence. In this review, we examine a list of proteins that have been defined to be allosteric and attempt to assign a reaction mechanism to as many as possible.

Indexed as

ProteinsAllosteric RegulationHumansLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingLigandsProteinsallosteryarginine repressorKNF modelMWC modelphosphoglycerate dehydrogenaseuracil phosphoribosyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID38783588
PMCPMC11216940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.