ArticleBiomedical chromatography : BMC2024
Quantitation of tazemetostat in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Article in Biomedical chromatography : BMC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To support a phase 1 trial in patients with lymphomas, we developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for tazemetostat quantitation in 20 μL of human plasma. After protein precipitation, chromatographic separation employed a Kinetex C18 column and a gradient of 0.1% formic acid in both water and acetonitrile, during a 3-min run time. Detection was achieved using a SCIEX 6500+ tandem mass spectrometer with electrospray positive-mode ionization. Validation was based on the latest Food and Drug Administration guidance. With a stable isotopic internal standard, the assay was linear within the range of 10-5000 ng/mL and proved to be accurate (91.9%-103.7%) and precise (<4.4% imprecision). Recovery varied between 93.3% and 121.1%, and matrix effect ranged from -25.5% to -4.9%. Hemolysis, lipemia, and dilution did not impact quantitation. Plasma stability was confirmed after three freeze-thaw cycles, 24 h at room temperature, and 4 months at -80°C. Incurred sample reanalysis yielded 94.4% samples within 20% difference (n = 36). External validation showed a mean bias of -11.1%. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data obtained from three patients suggested variable concentration time profiles, warranting collection of further data. The assay proved to be suitable for tazemetostat quantitation in human plasma and will support clinical studies by defining tazemetostat PKs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.