Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783327›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2024

Interventions to reduce inequalities for pregnant women living with disadvantage in high-income countries: an umbrella review protocol.

N Vousden, D Geddes-Barton, N Roberts, M Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N VousdenDepartment of Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, NuffieldHeadington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5216-8268
D Geddes-BartonDepartment of Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, NuffieldHeadington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
N RobertsNuffield Department of Population Health, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences and Department of Oncology, Bodleian Health Care Libraries, Oxford, UK.
M KnightDepartment of Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, NuffieldHeadington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. Marian.knight@npeu.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who live with disadvantages such as socioeconomic deprivation, substance misuse, poor mental health, or domestic abuse face inequalities in health before, during, and after pregnancy and for their infants through to childhood. Women do not experience these factors alone; they accumulate and interact. Therefore, there is a need for an overview of interventions that work across health and social care and target women at risk of inequalities in maternal or child health.

methodsSystematic review methodology will be used to identify systematic reviews from high-income countries that describe interventions aiming to reduce inequalities for women who experience social disadvantage during pregnancy. We will describe the range of interventions and their effectiveness in reducing inequalities in maternal or child health. Any individual, hospital, or community-level activity specific to women during the pre-conception, antenatal, or postpartum period up to 1 year after birth will be included, regardless of the setting in which they are delivered. We will search eight electronic databases with the pre-determined search strategy and supplement them with extensive grey literature searches. We will present a narrative synthesis, taking into account the quality assessment and coverage of included studies. DISCUSSION: Inequalities in maternal and child health are a key priority area for national policymakers. Understanding the range and effectiveness of interventions across the perinatal period will inform policy and practice. Identifying gaps in the evidence will inform future research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023455502.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesSystematic Reviews as TopicFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaternal HealthPregnancyPregnant PeopleResearch DesignSocioeconomic FactorsDeprivationDisadvantageEffectivenessInequalitiesPregnancySocial riskUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID38783327
PMCPMC11112858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.