Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783308›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Navigating the nexus between British Columbia's public consumption and decriminalization policies of illegal drugs.

Farihah Ali, Justine Law, Cayley Russell, Jean-Francois Crépault, João Castel-Branco Goulão, Kurt Lock, Jürgen Rehm

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using illicit drugs alone in Vancouver, Canada: a gender-based analysis.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Farihah AliInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St., Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada. farihah.ontcrism@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-3824
Justine LawInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St., Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Cayley RussellInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St., Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.
Jean-Francois CrépaultDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
João Castel-Branco GoulãoThe Intervention Service for Addictive Behaviors and Addictions (SICAD), Lisbon, Portugal.
Kurt LockBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jürgen RehmInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research (IMHPR), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), 33 Ursula Franklin St., Toronto, ON, M5S 2S1, Canada.

Funding

Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction 184698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In January 2023, the province of British Columbia (BC) decriminalized the possession of certain illegal drugs for personal use. The province's primary intent was to reduce the stigma associated with drug use, as well as barriers for people who use drugs (PWUD) to access treatment and supports. However, less than ten months into the decriminalization policy, due to growing concerns about public safety voiced by municipal governments and communities, the provincial government made amendments to the policy to ban the public consumption of illicit drugs in additional locations, and subsequently introduced additional legislation, Bill 34, aimed at regulating public consumption of drugs in public spaces. Some communities have also implemented local bylaws similarly regulating public drug use. Bill 34 and local bylaws may serve as tools to promote community health and safety and minimize direct and indirect harms associated with public drug use. However, such legislation may re-criminalize PWUD and reinforce negative perceptions surrounding drug use, especially if these policies are not paired with strategies to expand the availability and accessibility of critical harm reduction and housing services. Without ample access to these services, limitations on public drug use can potentially displace individuals to areas where they are more likely to use alone, further exposing them to substance use-related harms, and undermining the goals of decriminalization. The potential effects of these restrictions may also disproportionately impact marginalized populations. As of April 2024, Bill 34 remains on hold. Moving forward, it will be important to monitor this bill, as well as other public consumption bylaws and legislation, and their impact on BC's overall decriminalization initiative. Decision-makers are urged to increase engagement with PWUD and relevant stakeholders in the design and implementation of policies pertaining to public consumption to ensure that they effectively address the evolving needs and realities of PWUD, and align with decriminalization goals.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionIllicit DrugsSubstance-Related DisordersBritish ColumbiaDrug and Narcotic ControlDrug UsersHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthPublic PolicyRecreational Drug UseIllicit DrugsBritish ColumbiaBylawsCanadaDecriminalizationPublic drug consumptionStigmaSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID38783308
PMCPMC11112927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.