Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783304›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2024

Variation in care for inpatients with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder leads to development of a novel inpatient clinical pathway to standardize care.

Elana M Bern, Carly E Milliren, Kevin K Tsang, Lisa A Mancini, Julia K Carmody, Marina G Gearhart, Olivia Eldredge, Chase Samsel, McGreggor Crowley, Tracy K Richmond

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elana M BernDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Elana.bern@childrens.harvard.edu.
Carly E MillirenInstitutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kevin K TsangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Lisa A ManciniDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Julia K CarmodyDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Marina G GearhartDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Olivia EldredgeDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Chase SamselDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
McGreggor CrowleyDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, 333 Longwood Avenue, 5th Floor, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Tracy K RichmondDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is limited evidence to guide management of patients with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) admitted for medical stabilization. We describe variations in inpatient care which led to the development of a multidisciplinary inpatient clinical pathway (ICP) to provide standardized management and examine differences after the ICP was implemented.

methodsA retrospective review of patients with ARFID admitted to Adolescent Medicine, Gastroenterology, and General Pediatrics at a single academic center was conducted. We compare hospital utilization and use of consulting services during the pre-ICP (2015-2017) and post-ICP (2018-2020) periods.

results110 patients were admitted with ARFID (n = 57 pre- vs. n = 53 post-ICP). Most presented with moderate/severe malnutrition (63% pre vs. 81% post; p = 0.11) and co-morbid anxiety and/or depression (74% pre vs. 92% post; p = 0.01). There was some variation in use of enteral tube feeding by service in both periods (p = 0.76 and p = 0.38, respectively), although overall use was consistent between periods (46% pre vs. 58% post; p = 0.18). Pre-ICP, use of the restrictive eating disorder protocol differed across services (p < 0.001), with only AM using it. Overall, utilization of the restrictive eating disorder protocol decreased from 16% pre-ICP to 2% post-ICP (p = 0.02). There was variation by service in psychiatry/psychology (range 82-100% by service; p = 0.09) and social work consultations (range 17-71% by service; p = 0.001) during the pre-ICP period, though variation was reduced in the post-ICP period (p = 0.99 and p = 0.05, respectively). Implementation of the ICP led to improvements in these consultative services, with all patients in the post-ICP period receiving psychiatry/psychology consultation (p = 0.05) and an increase in social work consults from 44 to 64% (p = 0.03). Nutrition consults were consistently utilized in both periods (98% pre vs. 100% post; p = 0.33).

conclusionThe ICP was developed to standardize inpatient medical stabilization for patients with ARFID. In this single center study, implementation of the ICP increased standardized care for inpatients with ARFID with variation in care reduced: there were improvements in the use of consulting services and a reduction in the use of the restrictive eating disorder protocol. The ICP demonstrates the potential to further standardize and improve care over time.

Indexed as

ARFIDClinical pathwayInpatient care

Identifiers

PMID38783304
PMCPMC11112782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.