ArticleBMC neurology2024
Gender differences in risk factors for ischemic stroke: a longitudinal cohort study in East China.
Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological distress in stroke patients: latent class analysis and influencing factors.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Association between the psychological frailty index and stroke: a cohort study from CHARLS.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease increases cardiovascular disease risk in young adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Case fatality rate and associated factors of mortality among first-ever stroke patients: a prospective cohort study in Erbil City, Iraq.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEpidemiological studies of stroke and its risk factors can help develop strategies to prevent stroke. We aimed to explore the current gender-specific prevalence of stroke and associated risk factors.
methodsData were collected using a structured precoded questionnaire designed by the Stroke Screening and Prevention Programme of the National Health and Wellness Commission Stroke Prevention and Control Project Committee, between June 2020 and November 2021. A total of 7394 residents took part in the study, 187 of whom had a stroke. The baseline information of each participant was obtained and included in this study. The chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to examine the relationship between these indicators and stroke, and then multivariate logistic regression was used to construct the prediction scale between different genders.
resultsof 7394 participants,4571 (61.82%) were female. The overall prevalence of stroke patients in the study population was 2.53%, Multivariate analysis found that residence status (OR = 0.43, p = 0.002) 、HCY (OR = 0.962, p = 0.000)、Previous TIA (OR = 0.200, p = 0.002) 、Hypertension (OR = 0.33, p = 0.000) and Dyslipidemia (OR = 0.668, p = 0.028) were significant predictors of stroke. there are gender differences in the traditional risk factors for stroke, and women have more risk factors. ROC analysis confirmed the accuracy of the stroke risk model, and the AUC of the stroke risk model for the general population was 0.79 with p < 0.05. In the gender model, the female AUC was 0.796 (p < 0.05). and the male AUC was 0.786 with p < 0.05.
conclusionThe prevalence of stroke in adults aged 40 years and above is high in eastern China were high. management of risk factors can effectively prevent the occurrence of most strokes. more attention should be paid to gender differences associated with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.