Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783218›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

Systematic literature review of real-world evidence for treatments in HR+/HER2- second-line LABC/mBC after first-line treatment with CDK4/6i.

Veronique Lambert, Sarah Kane, Belal Howidi, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen, David Chandiwana, Yan Wu, Michelle Edwards, Imtiaz A Samjoo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Veronique LambertPfizer, 10017, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6984-0038
Sarah Kane *EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9341-4836
Belal Howidi *EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1166-7631
Bao-Ngoc Nguyen *EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-2270
David ChandiwanaArvinas, 06511, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-3499-2565
Yan WuPfizer, 10017, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3348-9232
Michelle EdwardsArvinas, 06511, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4292-3140
Imtiaz A Samjoo *EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada. imtiaz.samjoo@eversana.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-8055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines as the first-line (1 L) treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- LABC/mBC). Although there are many treatment options, there is no clear standard of care for patients following 1 L CDK4/6i. Understanding the real-world effectiveness of subsequent therapies may help to identify an unmet need in this patient population. This systematic literature review qualitatively synthesized effectiveness and safety outcomes for treatments received in the real-world setting after 1 L CDK4/6i therapy in patients with HR+/ HER2- LABC/mBC.

methodsMEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the Ovid® platform for real-world evidence studies published between 2015 and 2022. Grey literature was searched to identify relevant conference abstracts published from 2019 to 2022. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023383914). Data were qualitatively synthesized and weighted average median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was calculated for NCCN/ESMO-recommended post-1 L CDK4/6i treatment regimens.

resultsTwenty records (9 full-text articles and 11 conference abstracts) encompassing 18 unique studies met the eligibility criteria and reported outcomes for second-line (2 L) treatments after 1 L CDK4/6i; no studies reported disaggregated outcomes in the third-line setting or beyond. Sixteen studies included NCCN/ESMO guideline-recommended treatments with the majority evaluating endocrine-based therapy; five studies on single-agent ET, six studies on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) ± ET, and three studies with a mix of ET and/or mTORi. Chemotherapy outcomes were reported in 11 studies. The most assessed outcome was median rwPFS; the weighted average median rwPFS was calculated as 3.9 months (3.3-6.0 months) for single-agent ET, 3.6 months (2.5-4.9 months) for mTORi ± ET, 3.7 months for a mix of ET and/or mTORi (3.0-4.0 months), and 6.1 months (3.7-9.7 months) for chemotherapy. Very few studies reported other effectiveness outcomes and only two studies reported safety outcomes. Most studies had heterogeneity in patient- and disease-related characteristics.

conclusionsThe real-world effectiveness of current 2 L treatments post-1 L CDK4/6i are suboptimal, highlighting an unmet need for this patient population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansProgression-Free SurvivalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneCDK4 protein, humanCDK6 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6ERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerFirst-line CDK4/6iHR+/HER2-Real-world evidenceSystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID38783218
PMCPMC11112888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.