ReviewEye (London, England)2024
Imaging the brain: diagnosis aided by structural features on neuroimaging studies.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuro-ophthalmology: recent advances and paradigm shifts.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of neuroimaging allows the ophthalmologist to identify structural lesions in the orbit or along the neuroaxis that allow for more accurate diagnosis and treatment of patients with neuro-ophthalmic diseases. The primary imaging tools include computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), both of which can be used to evaluate the brain, spinal cord and canal, and orbits. Neurovascular structures, both arterial and venous, also can be imaged in high resolution with modern CT and MR angiography and CT and MR venography. In many cases, invasive procedures such as catheter angiography can be avoided with these studies, and angiography is often reserved for confirmation of vascular lesions combined with endovascular treatment. In this article, we illustrate how the evaluation of patients presenting with neuro-ophthalmic diseases involving the afferent and efferent visual pathways can be optimized with the use of appropriate diagnostic imaging studies. The complementary value of ophthalmic imaging is also demonstrated, and the advantages and disadvantages of both CT and MRI as well as their use in longitudinal patient follow up is demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.