ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Species-specific design of artificial promoters by transfer-learning based generative deep-learning model.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- UnconditionalSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advances in Key Genetic Elements and Strategies for High-Yield Heterologous Protein Expression inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cyanobacteria as a Photosynthetic Chassis for Metabolic Pathway Engineering with Heterologous Gene Expression.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Design prokaryotic cis-regulatory elements using language model.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Synthetic Biology Strategies for Activating Cryptic BGCs inACS omega · 2026Review
- Synthetic promoter design in plants: integration of computational and experimental approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Deep Generative Model-Driven Design of Microbial Synthetic Promoters.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- De novo promoter design method based on deep generative and dynamic evolution algorithm.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Synthetic Biology-Based Engineering Cells for Drug Delivery.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Native prokaryotic promoters share common sequence patterns, but are species dependent. For understudied species with limited data, it is challenging to predict the strength of existing promoters and generate novel promoters. Here, we developed PromoGen, a collection of nucleotide language models to generate species-specific functional promoters, across dozens of species in a data and parameter efficient way. Twenty-seven species-specific models in this collection were finetuned from the pretrained model which was trained on multi-species promoters. When systematically compared with native promoters, the Escherichia coli- and Bacillus subtilis-specific artificial PromoGen-generated promoters (PGPs) were demonstrated to hold all distribution patterns of native promoters. A regression model was developed to score generated either by PromoGen or by another competitive neural network, and the overall score of PGPs is higher. Encouraged by in silico analysis, we further experimentally characterized twenty-two B. subtilis PGPs, results showed that four of tested PGPs reached the strong promoter level while all were active. Furthermore, we developed a user-friendly website to generate species-specific promoters for 27 different species by PromoGen. This work presented an efficient deep-learning strategy for de novo species-specific promoter generation even with limited datasets, providing valuable promoter toolboxes especially for the metabolic engineering of understudied microorganisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.