Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783059›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024

Deep learning for dual detection of microsatellite instability and POLE mutations in colorectal cancer histopathology.

Marco Gustav, Nic Gabriel Reitsam, Zunamys I Carrero, Chiara M L Loeffler, Marko van Treeck, Tanwei Yuan, Nicholas P West, Philip Quirke, Titus J Brinker, Hermann Brenner and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The two souls of pathology-ready for biomarker complexity.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Marco GustavElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3598-5720
Nic Gabriel ReitsamPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0070-3158
Zunamys I CarreroElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8501-1566
Chiara M L LoefflerElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9659-5194
Marko van TreeckElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Tanwei YuanDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-6327
Nicholas P WestPathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Philip QuirkePathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3597-5444
Titus J BrinkerDigital Biomarkers for Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-5919
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Loëtitia FavreUniversité Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France.
Bruno MärklPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1001-103X
Alexander BrobeilInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael HoffmeisterDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8307-3197
Julien CalderaroUniversité Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France.
Anaïs PujalsUniversité Paris Est Créteil, INSERM, IMRB, Créteil, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3452-7420
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany. jakob-nikolas.kather@alumni.dkfz.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ER0814Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ER0815Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ER1505ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ER1505BBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01KD2104CBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01KH0404Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01KT2302Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BR 1704/17-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BR 1704/17-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BR 1704/6-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BR 1704/6-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BR 1704/6-4Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) CH 117/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) HE 5998/2-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) HE 5998/2-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) HO 5117/2-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) HO 5117/2-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) KL 2354/3-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) KL 2354/3-2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RO 2270/8-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) RO 2270/8-2Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid) 70113864Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (German Academic Exchange Service) 57616814DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR213331EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101057091EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101096312Yorkshire Cancer Research L386Yorkshire Cancer Research L394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the spectrum of colorectal tumors, microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors with DNA polymerase ε (POLE) mutations exhibit a hypermutated profile, holding the potential to respond to immunotherapy similarly to their microsatellite-instable (MSI) counterparts. Yet, due to their rarity and the associated testing costs, systematic screening for these mutations is not commonly pursued. Notably, the histopathological phenotype resulting from POLE mutations is theorized to resemble that of MSI. This resemblance not only could facilitate their detection by a transformer-based Deep Learning (DL) system trained on MSI pathology slides, but also indicates the possibility for MSS patients with POLE mutations to access enhanced treatment options, which might otherwise be overlooked. To harness this potential, we trained a Deep Learning classifier on a large dataset with the ground truth for microsatellite status and subsequently validated its capabilities for MSI and POLE detection across three external cohorts. Our model accurately identified MSI status in both the internal and external resection cohorts using pathology images alone. Notably, with a classification threshold of 0.5, over 75% of POLE driver mutant patients in the external resection cohorts were flagged as "positive" by a DL system trained on MSI status. In a clinical setting, deploying this DL model as a preliminary screening tool could facilitate the efficient identification of clinically relevant MSI and POLE mutations in colorectal tumors, in one go.

Identifiers

PMID38783059
PMCPMC11116442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.