Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783035›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

ChemFH: an integrated tool for screening frequent false positives in chemical biology and drug discovery.

Shaohua Shi, Li Fu, Jiacai Yi, Ziyi Yang, Xiaochen Zhang, Youchao Deng, Wenxuan Wang, Chengkun Wu, Wentao Zhao, Tingjun Hou and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shaohua ShiXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-0402-9244
Li FuXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China.ORCID 0009-0002-1800-757X
Jiacai YiSchool of Computer Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-6823-1882
Ziyi YangXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China.
Xiaochen ZhangSchool of Information Technology, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu, Henan 476000, P.R. China.
Youchao DengXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China.
Wenxuan WangXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China.
Chengkun WuSchool of Computer Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-5311
Wentao ZhaoSchool of Computer Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, P.R. China.
Tingjun HouCollege of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-7227-2580
Xiangxiang ZengCollege of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-1081-7658
Aiping LyuSchool of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-2303-0494
Dongsheng CaoXiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410013, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-3604-3785

Funding

2020 Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund 2020B1212030006Guangdong Province Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund Project 2020B1212030006HKBU Strategic Development Fund SDF19-0402-P02Hunan Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars 2021JJ10068National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFF1201400National Natural Science Foundation of China 22173118Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2022JJ80104Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province 2021RC4011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput screening rapidly tests an extensive array of chemical compounds to identify hit compounds for specific biological targets in drug discovery. However, false-positive results disrupt hit compound screening, leading to wastage of time and resources. To address this, we propose ChemFH, an integrated online platform facilitating rapid virtual evaluation of potential false positives, including colloidal aggregators, spectroscopic interference compounds, firefly luciferase inhibitors, chemical reactive compounds, promiscuous compounds, and other assay interferences. By leveraging a dataset containing 823 391 compounds, we constructed high-quality prediction models using multi-task directed message-passing network (DMPNN) architectures combining uncertainty estimation, yielding an average AUC value of 0.91. Furthermore, ChemFH incorporated 1441 representative alert substructures derived from the collected data and ten commonly used frequent hitter screening rules. ChemFH was validated with an external set of 75 compounds. Subsequently, the virtual screening capability of ChemFH was successfully confirmed through its application to five virtual screening libraries. Furthermore, ChemFH underwent additional validation on two natural products and FDA-approved drugs, yielding reliable and accurate results. ChemFH is a comprehensive, reliable, and computationally efficient screening pipeline that facilitates the identification of true positive results in assays, contributing to enhanced efficiency and success rates in drug discovery. ChemFH is freely available via https://chemfh.scbdd.com/.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysSoftwareDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFalse Positive ReactionsHumansSmall Molecule LibrariesSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID38783035
PMCPMC11223804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.