Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Training deep learning based dynamic MR image reconstruction using open-source natural videos.

Olivier Jaubert, Michele Pascale, Javier Montalt-Tordera, Julius Akesson, Ruta Virsinskaite, Daniel Knight, Simon Arridge, Jennifer Steeden, Vivek Muthurangu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olivier JaubertUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Michele PascaleUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Javier Montalt-TorderaUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Julius AkessonClinical Physiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ruta VirsinskaiteDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
Daniel KnightUCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Simon ArridgeDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Jennifer Steeden *UCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Vivek Muthurangu *UCL Centre for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. v.muthurangu@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation NH/18/1/33511, PG/17/6/32797Heart Research UK RG2661/17/20UK Research and Innovation MR/S032290/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop and assess a deep learning (DL) pipeline to learn dynamic MR image reconstruction from publicly available natural videos (Inter4K). Learning was performed for a range of DL architectures (VarNet, 3D UNet, FastDVDNet) and corresponding sampling patterns (Cartesian, radial, spiral) either from true multi-coil cardiac MR data (N = 692) or from synthetic MR data simulated from Inter4K natural videos (N = 588). Real-time undersampled dynamic MR images were reconstructed using DL networks trained with cardiac data and natural videos, and compressed sensing (CS). Differences were assessed in simulations (N = 104 datasets) in terms of MSE, PSNR, and SSIM and prospectively for cardiac cine (short axis, four chambers, N = 20) and speech cine (N = 10) data in terms of subjective image quality ranking, SNR and Edge sharpness. Friedman Chi Square tests with post-hoc Nemenyi analysis were performed to assess statistical significance. In simulated data, DL networks trained with cardiac data outperformed DL networks trained with natural videos, both of which outperformed CS (p < 0.05). However, in prospective experiments DL reconstructions using both training datasets were ranked similarly (and higher than CS) and presented no statistical differences in SNR and Edge Sharpness for most conditions.The developed pipeline enabled learning dynamic MR reconstruction from natural videos preserving DL reconstruction advantages such as high quality fast and ultra-fast reconstructions while overcoming some limitations (data scarcity or sharing). The natural video dataset, code and pre-trained networks are made readily available on github.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineVideo RecordingDeep learningDynamic MRIImage reconstructionMachine learningReal-time

Identifiers

PMID38783018
PMCPMC11116488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.