Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38783015›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessing the efficacy of 2D and 3D CNN algorithms in OCT-based glaucoma detection.

Rafiul Karim Rasel, Fengze Wu, Marion Chiariglione, Stacey S Choi, Nathan Doble, Xiaoyi Raymond Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rafiul Karim RaselDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Fengze WuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Marion ChiariglioneDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Stacey S ChoiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Nathan DobleDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.
Xiaoyi Raymond GaoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA. raymond.gao@osumc.edu.

Funding

The Ohio State University Vision Sciences Research Core Program (OSU-VSRCP)P30EY032857 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Sayoko E Moroi · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY032857NIH HHS P30EY032857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by the gradual degeneration of retinal ganglion cells, leading to irreversible blindness worldwide. Therefore, timely and accurate diagnosis of glaucoma is crucial, enabling early intervention and facilitating effective disease management to mitigate further vision deterioration. The advent of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has marked a transformative era in ophthalmology, offering detailed visualization of the macula and optic nerve head (ONH) regions. In recent years, both 2D and 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms have been applied to OCT image analysis. While 2D CNNs rely on post-prediction aggregation of all B-scans within OCT volumes, 3D CNNs allow for direct glaucoma prediction from the OCT data. However, in the absence of extensively pre-trained 3D models, the comparative efficacy of 2D and 3D-CNN algorithms in detecting glaucoma from volumetric OCT images remains unclear. Therefore, this study explores the efficacy of glaucoma detection through volumetric OCT images using select state-of-the-art (SOTA) 2D-CNN models, 3D adaptations of these 2D-CNN models with specific weight transfer techniques, and a custom 5-layer 3D-CNN-Encoder algorithm. The performance across two distinct datasets is evaluated, each focusing on the macula and the ONH, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the models' capabilities in identifying glaucoma. Our findings demonstrate that the 2D-CNN algorithm consistently provided robust results compared to their 3D counterparts tested in this study for glaucoma detection, achieving AUC values of 0.960 and 0.943 for the macular and ONH OCT test images, respectively. Given the scarcity of pre-trained 3D models trained on extensive datasets, this comparative analysis underscores the overall utility of 2D and 3D-CNN algorithms in advancing glaucoma diagnostic systems in ophthalmology and highlights the potential of 2D algorithms for volumetric OCT image-based glaucoma detection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGlaucomaNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, Optical CoherenceHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalOptic DiskRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID38783015
PMCPMC11116516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.