ArticleScientific reports2024
Classification and identification of tea diseases based on improved YOLOv7 model of MobileNeXt.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- TEA-LWNet: a lightweight multispectral feature enhancement network based on RGB-NIR fusion for detection of tea leaf diseases and pests.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- DSA-DET: a tea disease detection algorithm based on dynamic spatial pyramid and polarized linear attention.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Image segmentation and coverage estimation of deep-sea polymetallic nodules based on lightweight deep learning model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced multiscale plant disease detection with the PYOLO model innovations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the issues of low accuracy and slow response speed in tea disease classification and identification, an improved YOLOv7 lightweight model was proposed in this study. The lightweight MobileNeXt was used as the backbone network to reduce computational load and enhance efficiency. Additionally, a dual-layer routing attention mechanism was introduced to enhance the model's ability to capture crucial details and textures in disease images, thereby improving accuracy. The SIoU loss function was employed to mitigate missed and erroneous judgments, resulting in improved recognition amidst complex image backgrounds.The revised model achieved precision, recall, and average precision of 93.5%, 89.9%, and 92.1%, respectively, representing increases of 4.5%, 1.9%, and 2.6% over the original model. Furthermore, the model's volum was reduced by 24.69M, the total param was reduced by 12.88M, while detection speed was increased by 24.41 frames per second. This enhanced model efficiently and accurately identifies tea disease types, offering the benefits of lower parameter count and faster detection, thereby establishing a robust foundation for tea disease monitoring and prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.