ArticleScientific reports2024
Improved differentiation of cavernous malformation and acute intraparenchymal hemorrhage on CT using an AI algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of commercial artificial intelligence tools for the detection and volume quantification in intracerebral hemorrhage.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Decision Support Systems in Neurosurgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Multimodal Imaging Features in a Fatal Case of Incontinentia Pigmenti with Severe Neurological Involvement: A Case Report and Literature Review.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the utility of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm in differentiating between cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM) and acute intraparenchymal hemorrhage (AIH) on brain computed tomography (CT). A retrospective, multireader, randomized study was conducted to validate the performance of an AI algorithm in differentiating AIH from CCM on brain CT. CT images of CM and AIH (< 3 cm) were identified from the database. Six blinded reviewers, including two neuroradiologists, two radiology residents, and two emergency department physicians, evaluated CT images from 288 patients (CCM, n = 173; AIH, n = 115) with and without AI assistance, comparing diagnostic performance. Brain CT interpretation with AI assistance resulted in significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than without (86.92% vs. 79.86%, p < 0.001). Radiology residents and emergency department physicians showed significantly improved accuracy of CT interpretation with AI assistance than without (84.21% vs. 75.35%, 80.73% vs. 72.57%; respectively, p < 0.05). Neuroradiologists showed a trend of higher accuracy with AI assistance in the interpretation but lacked statistical significance (95.83% vs. 91.67%, p = 0.56). The use of an AI algorithm can enhance the differentiation of AIH from CCM in brain CT interpretation, particularly for nonexperts in neuroradiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.