Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38782958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Development of an alginate-chitosan biopolymer composite with dECM bioink additive for organ-on-a-chip articular cartilage.

Upasna Upadhyay, Saketh Kolla, Siddhartha Maredupaka, Swapna Priya, Kamma Srinivasulu, Lakshmi Kiran Chelluri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biomaterials in organoid research: current state and future directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Immobilization of the Proteolytic Fraction P1G10 fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Upasna UpadhyayStem Cell Unit, Global Medical Education and Research Foundation (GMERF), Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500004, India.
Saketh KollaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500004, India.
Siddhartha MaredupakaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500004, India.
Swapna PriyaStem Cell Unit, Global Medical Education and Research Foundation (GMERF), Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500004, India.
Kamma SrinivasuluDepartment of Biotechnology, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation (KLEF) Deemed to be University, Vaddeswaram, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, 522302, India.
Lakshmi Kiran ChelluriAdvanced Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Gleneagles Global Hospitals, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500004, India. apparusu_68@yahoo.co.in.

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board SPF/2021/000126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro use of articular cartilage on an organ-on-a-chip (OOAC) via microfluidics is challenging owing to the dense extracellular matrix (ECM) composed of numerous protein moieties and few chondrocytes, which has limited proliferation potential and microscale translation. Hence, this study proposes a novel approach for using a combination of biopolymers and decellularised ECM (dECM) as a bioink additive in the development of scalable OOAC using a microfluidic platform. The bioink was tested with native chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cell-induced chondrocytes using biopolymers of alginate and chitosan composite hydrogels. Two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) biomimetic tissue construction approaches have been used to characterise the morphology and cellular marker expression (by histology and confocal laser scanning microscopy), viability (cell viability dye using flow cytometry), and genotypic expression of ECM-specific markers (by quantitative PCR). The results demonstrated that the bioink had a significant impact on the increase in phenotypic and genotypic expression, with a statistical significance level of p < 0.05 according to Student's t-test. The use of a cell-laden biopolymer as a bioink optimised the niche conditions for obtaining hyaline-type cartilage under culture conditions, paving the way for testing mechano-responsive properties and translating these findings to a cartilage-on-a-chip microfluidics system.

Indexed as

AlginatesCartilage, ArticularChitosanChondrocytesExtracellular MatrixTissue EngineeringAnimalsBiopolymersCells, CulturedCell SurvivalHydrogelsLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMesenchymal Stem CellsMicrophysiological SystemsTissue ScaffoldsAlginatesBiopolymersChitosanHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID38782958
PMCPMC11116456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.