Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38782851›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024

Novel inhaled pulmonary vasodilators in adult cardiac surgery: a scoping review.

Navindra David, Sameer Lakha, Samantha Walsh, Eric Fried, Samuel DeMaria

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06702553 (Effect of Inhaled Nitric Oxide on Major Adverse Events Requiring Intensive Life Support in Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06702553 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Inhaled Nitric Oxide on Major Adverse Events Requiring Intensive Life Support in Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Phase III, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (Nitric Oxide for Reduced Intensive Support in Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass, the NORISC Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorXijing HospitalRan2025 to 2029Enrolled3,650ConditionsNitric Oxide, Cardiac Surgery, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery With Cardiopulmonary BypassArmsNitric Oxide Gas, Standard Care Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Navindra DavidDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. navindra.david@icahn.mssm.edu.ORCID 0009-0005-7298-4322
Sameer LakhaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Samantha WalshHunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Eric FriedDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Samuel DeMariaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common cause of postoperative mortality in cardiac surgery that is commonly treated with conventional inhaled therapies, specifically nitric oxide and prostacyclin. Alternative therapies include inhaled milrinone and levosimendan, which are receiving more research interest and are increasing in clinical use as they may cut costs while allowing for easier administration. We sought to conduct a scoping review to appraise the evidence base for the use of these two novel inhaled vasodilators as an intervention for PH in cardiac surgery. SOURCE: We searched Embase and MEDLINE for relevant articles from 1947 to 2022. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe identified 17 studies including 969 patients. The included studies show that inhaled milrinone and levosimendan are selective pulmonary vasodilators with potential benefits ranging from ease of weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass to reduction in ventricular dysfunction. Nevertheless, high-quality data are limited, and study design and comparators are extremely heterogeneous, limiting the potential validity and generalizability of findings.

conclusionThe findings of this scoping review suggest that milrinone and levosimendan may be effective alternatives to current inhaled therapies for cardiac dysfunction in the setting of PH. Nevertheless, randomized trials have focused on specific agents and consistent outcome measures are needed to better validate the early-stage promise of these agents. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/z3k6f/ ); first posted 21 July 2022.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresHypertension, PulmonaryMilrinoneSimendanVasodilator AgentsAdministration, InhalationAdultHumansPostoperative ComplicationsMilrinoneSimendanVasodilator Agentscardiac surgeryinhaled pulmonary vasodilatorslevosimendanmilrinonepulmonary hypertension

Identifiers

PMID38782851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.