SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2024
Factors associated with peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for type III achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of hiatal hernia on periprocedural outcomes following peroral endoscopic myotomy: a nationwide retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Esophageal morphology does not predict post-operative outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an emerging effective treatment for achalasia. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond well to the treatment. After over a decade of clinical practice, potential risk factors associated with POEM failure have been identified. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence of risk factors for POEM failure.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 10th, 2022. We included English studies that reported POEM outcomes in achalasia patients and identified risk factors for POEM failure. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed using fixed- or randomized-effect models to pool the effect size.
resultsA total of 27 studies comprising 9371 patients with achalasia were included in this review. The pooled failure rate was 8% (90% CI 7%-10%). We identified sigmoid esophagus (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.45-2.47), type I achalasia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.63), and type III achalasia (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78) were associated with a worse clinical response. Conversely, type II achalasia was associated with a better response (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.75). Prior treatment with Heller myotomy (OR 5.75, 95% CI 3.97-8.34) and prior balloon dilation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07-1.29) were also associated with a higher risk of clinical failure.
conclusionOur meta-analysis results demonstrated that sigmoid esophagus, manometric achalasia subtype, and prior treatment were associated with POEM failure. This information could be used to guide treatment decisions and improve the success rate of POEM in achalasia patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38782829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.