Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38782791›Full record

ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2024

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models versus allometric scaling for prediction of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor exposure from adults to children.

Maddalena Centanni, Omar Zaher, David Elhad, Mats O Karlsson, Lena E Friberg

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maddalena CentanniDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden.
Omar ZaherDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden.
David ElhadDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden.
Mats O KarlssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden.
Lena E FribergDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Box 580, Uppsala, 751 23, Sweden. lena.friberg@farmaci.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-2979-679X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeModel-based methods can predict pediatric exposure and support initial dose selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of allometric scaling of population pharmacokinetic (popPK) versus physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in predicting the exposure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for pediatric patients (≥ 2 years), based on adult data. The drugs imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib were selected as case studies due to their complex PK profiles including high inter-patient variability, active metabolites, time-varying clearances and non-linear absorption.

methodsPediatric concentration measurements and adult popPK models were derived from the literature. Adult PBPK models were generated in PK-Sim® using available physicochemical properties, calibrated to adult data when needed. PBPK and popPK models for the pediatric populations were translated from the models for adults and were used to simulate concentration-time profiles that were compared to the observed values.

resultsTen pediatric datasets were collected from the literature. While both types of models captured the concentration-time profiles of imatinib, its active metabolite, sunitinib and pazopanib, the PBPK models underestimated sunitinib metabolite concentrations. In contrast, allometrically scaled popPK simulations accurately predicted all concentration-time profiles. Trough concentration (C

conclusionBased on the identified case studies it appears that allometric scaling of popPK models is better suited to predict exposure of TKIs in pediatric patients ≥ 2 years. This advantage may be attributed to the stable enzyme expression patterns from 2 years old onwards, which can be easily related to adult levels through allometric scaling. In some instances, both methods performed comparably. Understanding where discrepancies between the model methods arise, can further inform model development and ultimately support pediatric dose selection.

Indexed as

Imatinib MesylateIndazolesModels, BiologicalProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolComputer SimulationFemaleHumansAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateIndazolespazopanibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibAllometric scalingPediatric pharmacokineticsPhysiologically based pharmacokinetic modelingTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38782791
PMCPMC11390758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.