ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2024
Development of a nine-variant reference material panel to standardize cell-free DNA detection.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and characterization of nucleosomal DNA-based reference materials for the epidermal growth factor receptor gene liquid biopsy.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Research Advances of Extrachromosomal Circular DNA in Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detection of specific gene mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) serves as a valuable cancer biomarker and is increasingly being explored as an appealing alternative to tissue-based methods. However, the lack of available reference materials poses challenges in accurately evaluating the performance of different assays. In this study, we present the development of a comprehensive reference material panel for cfDNA detection, encompassing nine hotspot mutations in KRAS/BRAF/EGFR/PIK3CA at three variant allele frequencies (VAFs), ranging from 0.33 to 23.9%. To mimic cfDNA, these reference materials were generated by enzymatically digesting cell-line DNA into approximately 154-bp to 173-bp fragments using a laboratory-developed reaction system. The VAFs for each variation were precisely determined through validated digital PCR assays with high accuracy. Furthermore, the reliability and applicability of this panel were confirmed through two independent NGS assays, yielding concordant results. Collectively, our findings suggest that this novel reference material panel holds great potential for validation, evaluation, and quality control processes associated with liquid biopsy assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38782781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.