Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38782483›Full record

SynthesisBMJ paediatrics open2024

Role of nebulised magnesium sulfate in treating acute asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jogender Kumar, Prawin Kumar, Jagdish Prasad Goyal, Nikhil Rajvanshi, Kalyana Prabhakaran, Jitendra Meena, Atul Gupta

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Effectiveness of Intravenous and Nebulized MgSOChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jogender Kumar *Department of Pediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0464-9689
Prawin Kumar *Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Jagdish Prasad GoyalDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India JPGOYAL@REDIFFMAIL.COM.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-6909
Nikhil RajvanshiDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Kalyana PrabhakaranDepartment of Pediatrics, AIIMS Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Jitendra MeenaDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Atul GuptaDepartment of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1610-0335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo review the efficacy of nebulised magnesium sulfate (MgSO

methodsThe authors searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published until 15 December 2023. RCTs were included if they compared the efficacy and safety of nebulised MgSO

results10 RCTs enrolling 2301 children with acute asthma were included. All trials were placebo controlled and administered nebulised MgSO

conclusionsThere is low-certainty evidence that nebulised MgSO PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022373692.

Indexed as

AsthmaMagnesium SulfateNebulizers and VaporizersAcute DiseaseAdministration, InhalationAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBronchodilator AgentsChildHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBronchodilator AgentsMagnesium SulfateAdolescent HealthChild Health

Identifiers

PMID38782483
PMCPMC11116886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.