ArticleGait & posture2024
Effect of age on ankle biomechanics and tibial compression during stair descent.
Article in Gait & posture, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStress fracture is a concern among older adults, as age-related decrements in ankle neuromuscular function may impair their ability to attenuate tibial compressive forces experienced during daily locomotor tasks, such as stair descent. Yet, it is unknown if older adults exhibit greater tibial compression than their younger counterparts when descending stairs. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do older adults exhibit differences in ankle biomechanics that alter their tibial compression during stair descent compared to young adults, and is there a relation between tibial compression and specific changes in ankle biomechanics?
methodsThirteen young (18-25 years) and 13 older (> 65 years) adults had ankle joint biomechanics and tibial compression quantified during a stair descent. Discrete ankle biomechanics (peak joint angle and moment, and joint stiffness) and tibial compression (maximum and impulse) measures were submitted to an independent t-test, while ankle joint angle and moment, and tibial compression waveforms were submitted to an independent statistical parametric mapping t-test to determine group differences. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) determined the relation between discrete ankle biomechanics and tibial compression measures for all participants, and each group.
resultsOlder adults exhibited smaller maximum tibial compression (p = 0.004) from decreases in peak ankle joint angle and moment between 17 % and 34 % (p = 0.035), and 20-31 % of stance (p < 0.001) than young adults. Ankle biomechanics exhibited a negligible to weak correlation with tibial compression for all participants, with peak ankle joint moment and maximum tibial compression (r = -0.48 ± 0.32) relation the strongest. Older adults typically exhibited a stronger relation between ankle biomechanics and tibial compression (e.g., r = -0.48 ± 0.47 vs r = -0.27 ± 0.52 between peak ankle joint moment and maximum tibial compression). SIGNIFICANCE: Older adults altered ankle biomechanics and decreased maximum tibial compression to safely execute the stair descent. Yet, specific alterations in ankle biomechanics could not be identified as a predictor of changes in tibial compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.