Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38781588›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Mobile Health Apps, Family Caregivers, and Care Planning: Scoping Review.

Marjorie M Kelley, Tia Powell, Djibril Camara, Neha Shah, Jenna M Norton, Chelsea Deitelzweig, Nivedha Vaidy, Chun-Ju Hsiao, Jing Wang, Arlene S Bierman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07654998 (Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Application for Family Caregivers of Patients Receiving Home Palliative Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07654998 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Mobile Health Application for Family Caregivers of Patients Receiving Home Palliative Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKutahya Health Sciences UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsPalliative Care, Cancer, CaregiverArmsMobile Health Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marjorie M KelleyThe Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5387-6119
Tia PowellMontefiore Einstein Center for Bioethics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8336-9393
Djibril CamaraCredence Management Solution, USAID Global Health Technical Professionals, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4241-9542
Neha ShahNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-604X
Jenna M NortonNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0407-8505
Chelsea DeitelzweigAgency for Health Care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-9997-1902
Nivedha VaidyNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-8645-6802
Chun-Ju HsiaoCenter for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5494-1971
Jing WangFlorida State University College of Nursing, Tallahassee, FL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4012-0977
Arlene S BiermanAgency for Health Care Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4792-9020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) face substantial challenges in planning and coordinating increasingly complex care. Family caregivers provide important assistance for people with MCCs but lack sufficient support. Caregiver apps have the potential to help by enhancing care coordination and planning among the health care team, including patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

objectiveWe aim to conduct a scoping review to assess the evidence on the development and use of caregiver apps that support care planning and coordination, as well as to identify key factors (ie, needs, barriers, and facilitators) related to their use and desired caregiver app functionalities.

methodsPapers intersecting 2 major domains, mobile health (mHealth) apps and caregivers, that were in English and published from 2015 to 2021 were included in the initial search from 6 databases and gray literature and ancestry searches. As per JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Scoping Review guidelines and PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews), 2 authors independently screened full texts with disagreements resolved by a third author. Working in pairs, the authors extracted data using a pilot-tested JBI extraction table and compared results for consensus.

resultsWe identified 34 papers representing 25 individual studies, including 18 (53%) pilot and feasibility studies, 13 (38%) qualitative studies, and 2 experimental or quasi-experimental studies. None of the identified studies assessed an intervention of a caregiver app for care planning and coordination for people with MCCs. We identified important caregiver needs in terms of information, support, and care coordination related to both caregiving and self-care. We compiled desired functionalities and features enabling apps to meet the care planning and care coordination needs of caregivers, in particular, the integration of caregiver roles into the electronic health record.

conclusionsCaregiver needs identified through this study can inform developers and researchers in the design and implementation of mHealth apps that integrate with the electronic health record to link caregivers, patients, and clinicians to support coordinated care for people with MCCs. In addition, this study highlights the need for more rigorous research on the use of mHealth apps to support caregivers in care planning and coordination.

Indexed as

CaregiversMobile ApplicationsTelemedicineHumansPatient Care Planningapplicationappscaregivercaregiverscarerschronic conditioncliniciansdevelopmentdigital healtheHealthelectronic health recordfamily caregiversimplementationinformal caregiversmHealthmHealth applicationsmobile healthmobile phonesupporttelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38781588
PMCPMC11157180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.