Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38781542›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2024

Retrospective Study of Claudin 18 Isoform 2 Prevalence and Prognostic Association in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.

Rebecca Waters, Matheus Sewastjanow-Silva, Kohei Yamashita, Ahmed Abdelhakeem, Kenneth K Iwata, Diarmuid Moran, Dina Elsouda, Abraham Guerrero, Melissa Pizzi, Ernesto Rosa Vicentini and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rebecca WatersMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Matheus Sewastjanow-SilvaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0003-4804-1891
Kohei YamashitaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ahmed AbdelhakeemMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-7186-1332
Kenneth K IwataAstellas Pharma, Inc, Northbrook, IL.ORCID 0009-0003-5842-2863
Diarmuid MoranAstellas Pharma, Inc, Northbrook, IL.
Dina ElsoudaAstellas Pharma, Inc, Northbrook, IL.
Abraham GuerreroAstellas Pharma, Inc, Northbrook, IL.
Melissa PizziMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ernesto Rosa VicentiniMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0009-0004-1272-7650
Namita ShanbhagMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Anh TaMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Deyali ChatterjeeMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-3322-1163
Jaffer A AjaniMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-9946-0629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClaudin 18 isoform 2 (CLDN18.2) is an emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to obtain deeper understanding of CLDN18.2 positivity patterns, prognostic implications, and associations with various demographic, clinical, and molecular characteristics in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma.

methodsArchived tumor tissue samples from 304 patients with G/GEJ adenocarcinoma in the United States were assessed for CLDN18.2 positivity by immunohistochemistry. CLDN18.2 positivity was defined as ≥50% or ≥75% of tumor cells with CLDN18 staining intensity ≥2+. CLDN18.2 positivity patterns were analyzed for association with prognosis and clinicopathologic/demographic characteristics. Where possible, CLDN18.2 positivity was analyzed for matched tissue samples to assess concordance between primary and metastatic tumors and concordance before and after chemotherapy.

resultsThe overall prevalence of CLDN18.2-positive tumors (with ≥75% cutoff) was 44.4% (n = 135 of 304). CLDN18.2-positive tumors had a prevalence of 51.4% (n = 91 of 177) in gastric and 34.6% (n = 44 of 127) in GEJ adenocarcinoma. With a ≥50% cutoff, the prevalence of CLDN18.2-positive tumors was 64.4% (n = 114 of 177) in gastric adenocarcinoma and 44.9% (n = 57 of 127) in GEJ adenocarcinoma. There was no association between overall survival and CLDN18.2 positivity using either threshold. Statistically significant associations were noted between CLDN18.2 positivity and sex, histologic type of G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, and adenocarcinoma subtype (≥75% cutoff), and metastasis site and tumor grade (≥50% cutoff). The overall concordance of CLDN18.2 positivity (≥75% cutoff) was 73% (27 of 37) for matched primary versus metastatic tumor samples and 74% (29 of 39) for matched samples before and after chemotherapy.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that CLDN18.2 positivity did not correlate with survival in G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, consistent with published data. On the basis of matched sample analysis, CLDN18.2 appears to demonstrate >70% concordance as a biomarker. Observed correlations with certain patient/tumor characteristics warrant further study.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaClaudinsEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisProtein IsoformsRetrospective StudiesClaudinsCLDN18 protein, humanProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID38781542
PMCPMC11371102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.